Teams

YTC-Mixed Up

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-13vs YTC-Baby Got BackhandLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Watkins / Kirk Ehlis vs Bri Plath / Cole Chrsitianson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeata Miller / Steve Wolcott vs Jennifer Terami / Ryan Inouye2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Jacobson / Daniel Kranz vs Erika Mullins / Mario Piergallini1-6, 1-6
2024-10-12vs EW-PC-HebdonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Jacobson / Steve Wolcott vs Bryan Robison / Tiffany Hebdon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Braun / Scott Ladd vs Aric Robertson / Shannon Robison6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Watkins / Daniel Kranz vs Austen Hebdon / Whitney Hunt0-6, 1-6
2024-10-12vs PC-Wild AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Braun / Steve Wolcott vs Doreen Miller / Brian Cunnington7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeata Miller / Kirk Ehlis vs Kari Denson / Ryan Brooks6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Watkins / Scott Ladd vs Rebecca Hiles / Chris Denney6-3, 6-0
2024-10-11vs YTC-String TheoryWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Braun / Steve Wolcott vs Sarah Michael / Fred Wells6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShirley Berger / Kirk Ehlis vs Pamela Urquhart / Sean Michael6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Jacobson / Daniel Kranz vs Kellye Richelderfer / Carlos Olivares6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Hebdon40102979
2YTC-Baby Got Backhand31751299
3YTC-Mixed Up227512100
4PC-Wild Aces134818122
5YTC-String Theory0421020128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lisa Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Beata Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Kirk Ehlis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Daniel Kranz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Megan Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Ladd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shirley Berger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Wolcott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Braun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Watkins + Kirk Ehlis2346% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Kranz + Lisa Watkins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Watkins
73W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3
Beata Miller
66W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Kirk Ehlis
13W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Daniel Kranz
3W–7L career · type T · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Jacobson
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Ladd
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Berger
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steve Wolcott
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Braun
39W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.