Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0 W GML FLAC Colosimo

2023 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.08 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesBeth Ivey / Michelle Colosimo vs Karen Papcke / Joy Asta6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJill Lundvall vs Tessa Papcke1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSavannah Ferkins / Kimberly Darre vs Rebecca Greving / Sarah Augustson2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Kalis vs Veronica Saunders6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesColleen MUTCHLER / Monica Lineberger vs Stacee Busateri / Chris DAmico1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLindsey Kalis / Beth Ivey vs Andrea Pipito / Candace Wendlick2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDoreen Potter vs Carolyn Hottinger1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Darre / Monica Lineberger vs Jane Mlenar / Monica Thomas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Kay Kaufmann / Colleen MUTCHLER vs Karen Moran / Kim Smazal3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJill Lundvall / Kimberly Darre vs Chrissy Fait / Grace McKendry3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hoeft vs Joyce Kunath6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Colosimo / Beth Ivey vs Brooke Powers / Rebecca Lauterbach6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLindsey Kalis vs April Shaffer7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDoreen Potter / Savannah Ferkins vs Danielle Engel / Kelli Kunath1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJill Lundvall / Megan Paddock vs Joan Kosidowski / MICHELLE MESSLING6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSavannah Ferkins vs Bethany Bradd0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Darre / Colleen MUTCHLER vs Claudia Beaudoin / Julia Haas6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Ivey / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs Maye Berroya / Renee LeSage3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMegan Paddock / Melissa Hoeft vs Olga Huber / Anna Huck6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJill Lundvall vs Krin Kramer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Lineberger / Savannah Ferkins vs Fran Davis / Linda Balthazor7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesColleen MUTCHLER vs Jessica Schultz3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Klein / Mary Kay Kaufmann vs JANE SCHNEIDER / Mary Sica Manders6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hoeft / Jill Lundvall vs Sheila Washburn / Jeanne Bieser7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLindsey Kalis vs Katrina Hoffmann4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Colosimo / Beth Ivey vs Stacy Gass / Mary Lynn Nowak6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMonica Lineberger vs Julie McLain3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Kay Kaufmann / Doreen Potter vs Judy Sullivan / Katherine Eddy0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBeth Ivey / Lindsey Kalis vs Deborah Pape / Katie Zanoni6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Hoeft vs Shyla Deacon6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Klein / Kimberly Darre vs Rebecca Chiang / Casey Aghjian1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMegan Paddock vs Marin Koebert2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Beth Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Michelle Colosimo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Megan Paddock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Melissa Hoeft
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.84
Jill Lundvall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Doreen Potter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Colleen MUTCHLER
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Julie Klein
published
Kimberly Darre
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lindsey Kalis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Mary Kay Kaufmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Lineberger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Nicole Pease
published
Savannah Ferkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sherwin Miranda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Colosimo + Beth Ivey19560% games+15.4% vs expected
Megan Paddock + Jill Lundvall5067% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Hoeft + Doreen Potter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Ivey
68W–31L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Michelle Colosimo
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Megan Paddock
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Melissa Hoeft
27W–16L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jill Lundvall
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Doreen Potter
13W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Colleen MUTCHLER
8W–5L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Klein
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Darre
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Kalis
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kay Kaufmann
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Lineberger
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Pease
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Savannah Ferkins
8W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherwin Miranda
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.