Teams

Poe/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-10vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 SinglesAubrie Poe vs Laura Ketcham7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Shipp / Meghan Wells vs Julie Briggs / Brittany Portwood2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNoel Lancaster / Anastasia Branham vs Emily Donohue Speer / Carmon Hipp0-6, 0-6
2025-05-04vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 23
L#1 DoublesMeghan Wells / Annie Adams vs Laura Ketcham / Joni Wolfe6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAubrie Poe vs Julia Whitworth6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAna Sanchis / Leland Wheland vs Laura Adams / Emily Donohue Speer1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Weldon vs Caitlin Michaelis6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Anastasia Branham vs Callie Voges / Brittany Portwood3-6, 1-6
2025-04-19vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Ana Sanchis vs Kennisha Cann / Joni Wolfe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAubrie Poe vs Laura Ketcham3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoel Lancaster / Annie Adams vs Courtney Brunetz / Stacy Sorrow1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Weldon vs Caitlin Michaelis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLeland Wheland / Anna Weldon vs Laura Ketcham / Kennisha Cann0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAna Sanchis vs Emily Donohue Speer5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnastasia Branham / Rachel Adams vs Julie Briggs / Callie Voges0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAubrie Poe / Melissa Shipp vs Laura Adams / Brittany Portwood3-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAna Sanchis / Leland Wheland vs Stacy Sorrow / Julie Briggs1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoel Lancaster / Tara Biondolillo vs Emily Donohue Speer / Jill Joyce3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAubrie Poe vs Neeve Owen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnastasia Branham / Melissa Shipp vs Kennisha Cann / Carmon Hipp3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aubrie Poe
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.81
Ana Sanchis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Anastasia Branham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Anna Weldon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Melissa Shipp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Annie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Noel Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Tara Biondolillo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Meghan Wells
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Leland Wheland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aubrie Poe
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ana Sanchis
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Anastasia Branham
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Anna Weldon
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Shipp
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
4
Annie Adams
6W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Noel Lancaster
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Tara Biondolillo
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35
Meghan Wells
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Leland Wheland
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.