Teams

Samuell Grand/Kilcullen-Shuff W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-31Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAngelina Kilcullen / Emily Suter vs Stephanie Shah / Marianne Hark7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMegan Killebrew vs Joy Sebold0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLacy Bain / Jennifer Shuff vs Amanda Forrest / Julie Bullard5-7, 2-6
2025-10-24vs McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.5FWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Straley / Emily Suter vs Shera Cameron / Jennifer Dvorak6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLexi Page / Kelsey Hills vs Julie Colston / Monica Vivanco6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanet Stegner / Kristin Thormodsgard vs Heather Pereira / Michelle Smith6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-17vs The Lakes TA/Akbany-Little W3.5FWon 40
W#1 DoublesJackie Howell / Jennifer Shuff vs Michelle Buchanan / Hilary McNamara7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLexi Page vs Christie Rymsza6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Suter / Angelina Kilcullen vs Erika Anderson / Audrey Jarrin6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLacy Bain / Kelsey Hills vs Haylee Boyle / Kristie Lipper6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSara Straley / Emily Suter vs Helen Tongai Ward / Paula Marbach7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Howell / Lacy Bain vs Louise Master / Toni Hair6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngelina Kilcullen / Jennifer Shuff vs Toni Harrigan / Karla Jenkins6-3, 7-5
2025-09-26vs TBarM/Mizerany W3.5FWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Straley / Jackie Howell vs Diane Mizerany / Lindsey Orien6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLacy Bain vs Carolyn Benson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Shuff / Megan Killebrew vs Rebecca Howey / Sharon Jester6-3, 6-1
2025-09-19vs Eldorado/Miller W3.5FWon 21
W#1 DoublesLacy Bain / Emily Suter vs Lindsey Widtfeldt / Melissa Bell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie Howell / Angelina Kilcullen vs July Crockett / Brooke Edge6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Droemer / Veronica Owens vs Tatyana Borukhovich / Erma Bryant1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Emily Suter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Sara Straley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Lindsey Hutchinson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.44
Jackie Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Lacy Bain
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.34
Angelina Kilcullen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Jennifer Shuff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Kelsey Hills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Janet Stegner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Kristin Thormodsgard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Megan Killebrew
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Veronica Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Droemer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lexi Page
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Stegner + Lacy Bain5166% games+9.8% vs expected
Angelina Kilcullen + Jennifer Shuff4353% games+4.9% vs expected
Kelsey Hills + Lindsey Hutchinson7361% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Shuff + Lacy Bain3256% games+1.3% vs expected
Angelina Kilcullen + Lacy Bain3245% games−10.3% vs expected
Angelina Kilcullen + Janet Stegner4261% gamesnot enough data
Emily Suter + Jackie Howell404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Suter + Sara Straley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Suter
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Sara Straley
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Lindsey Hutchinson
30W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Jackie Howell
16W–6L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
Lacy Bain
29W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Angelina Kilcullen
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jennifer Shuff
25W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Kelsey Hills
19W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Janet Stegner
31W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kristin Thormodsgard
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.15
Megan Killebrew
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Veronica Owens
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Kathy Droemer
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lexi Page
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.