Teams

EFSC - Flores

2024 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-26vs Brevard/Rocker/18&Over9.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesChaninda Narakorn / Paul Prior vs Jacob Kargauer / Larissa Kiyoku3-6, 1-6
2024-07-23vs Brevard/Rocker/18&Over9.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Flores / Chaninda Narakorn vs Angel Alayon / Senta Melvin7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Hine / Mary Devereaux vs Larissa Kiyoku / Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues1-6, 5-7
2024-07-19vs RCCB - LuskLost 01
L#2 DoublesChaninda Narakorn / Casey Coffey vs Trey Crowley / Erika Nigh7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-10vs RCCB - LuskLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Devereaux / Daniel Flores vs Kevin Lackey / Marcia Lusk3-6, 1-6
2024-06-14vs Brevard/Rocker/18&Over9.0MXDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCasey Coffey / Chaninda Narakorn vs Angel Alayon / Tiffany Donovan6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Devereaux / Kyle Hine vs Jacob Kargauer / Larissa Kiyoku6-3, 6-4
2024-06-07vs RCCB - LuskWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Devereaux / Kyle Hine vs Marcia Lusk / Ronald Gould6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChaninda Narakorn / Daniel Flores vs Erika Nigh / Trey Crowley6-4, 6-2
2024-05-24vs Brevard/Rocker/18&Over9.0MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaninda Narakorn / Kyle Hine vs Zachary Eichholz / Senta Melvin6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-17vs RCCB - LuskSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChaninda Narakorn / Paul Prior vs Kleber Fukamizu / Angie Williams6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Devereaux / Daniel Flores vs Erika Nigh / Rafael Reyes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kyle Hine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.28
Chaninda Narakorn
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.24
Angela Copeland
published 4.5
4.21
Eric Mulhern
published
4.21
Cheryl Keller
published 4.5
4.15
Mary Devereaux
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Garrett Bell
published
4.02
Daniel Flores
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Devereaux + Kyle Hine4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Hine
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Chaninda Narakorn
39W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Angela Copeland
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
4.24
Eric Mulhern
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Cheryl Keller
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Mary Devereaux
77W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Garrett Bell
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
Daniel Flores
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.