Teams

KAlgood (PCC)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-26vs DShealy/TRand (FCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Stater / Meg McSherry vs Patty Swan / Janine Geada0-6, 2-6
2024-04-19vs KLull (Bridgehampton)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Stater vs Julie Butkovich1-6, 0-6
2024-04-12vs AHewitt (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Stater vs Debbie Porter6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-05vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Denton / Cindy Stater vs Kimberly Stafford / Shawna Lauer6-1, 6-0
2024-03-15vs CAckels (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Schaphorst / Cindy Stater vs Julia Murphy / Trina Blankenship4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-03-08vs ETurkus (Springfield)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara van Meerten / Cindy Stater vs Brandy Newton / Mary Stewart Chatman0-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs MFrancis/RFitzsimons (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Stater vs Jessica Babinski0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Jess Heath
published
2.41
Kelly Algood
published
2.40
Allison Geoghegan
published 2.5
2.38
Brooks Herman
published 2.5
2.33
Melissa Pavlovich
published
2.31
Brenley Ogden
published 2.5
2.19
Barbara van Meerten
published 2.5
2.17
Cindy Stater
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Karen Schaphorst
published
Meg McSherry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Algood + Cindy Stater044 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Algood + Melissa Pavlovich123 matchesnot enough data
Brenley Ogden + Melissa Pavlovich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jess Heath
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%55%45%
2.48
Kelly Algood
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Allison Geoghegan
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Brooks Herman
14W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.38
Melissa Pavlovich
5W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Brenley Ogden
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Barbara van Meerten
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Cindy Stater
22W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Karen Schaphorst
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meg McSherry
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.