Teams

B5 Burkwood Carter Jr

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-12vs B8 Willow Oaks HamlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Carter / Modestine Carter vs Michael Chapman / Anne Scher6-2, 6-2
2022-11-05vs B6 Kanawha CzyszczonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Carter / Modestine Carter vs Heather DeBolt / Beverly Clary6-3, 6-3
2022-10-30vs B9 MAC Talamo 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Davis / Kimberly Garrett vs Donna Talamo / Amadeus Malheiros6-0, 6-0
2022-10-29vs B1 Avalon Ghita 6.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Powell / Modestine Carter vs Andrew Zima / Christina Sava6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-15vs B4 Belmont StyerWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Powell / Modestine Carter vs Aditya Chavan / Laura Ransone6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-01vs B7 ACAC LewisLost 02
L#1 DoublesModestine Carter / Kevin Carter vs Greg Deeb / Mary Knick4-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesMike Davis / April Buckles vs Natalie Lewis / Will Benton3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Courtney Booth
published 4
3.50
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.42
Jonathan Kovarcik
published
3.26
Mike Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
April Buckles
published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Carter
published
3.19
Ellen Bedichek
published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Garrett
published
2.71
Andrew Powell
published 3
2.61
Wayne Clark
published
Mark Hudson
published
Richard Shute
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Powell + Kimberly Garrett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Booth
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Modestine Carter
219W–132L career · 10 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jonathan Kovarcik
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Mike Davis
95W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
April Buckles
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kevin Carter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ellen Bedichek
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Kimberly Garrett
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Andrew Powell
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Wayne Clark
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Mark Hudson
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Shute
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.