Teams

LTFC PINK

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-13vs GAC ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Sheila Baker vs Christine Heimbuck / Danita Geise2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-12vs PCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheila Salyers / Amy Silverman vs Sandra Liberati / Mary Pearce4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Baker / Judy Mickelson vs Judy Mohr / Elaine Tyson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-29vs PCC PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Salyers / Judy Mickelson vs Maria Hush / Laura Dayton3-6, 3-6
2022-08-22vs HRCA GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeslie Moody / Amy Silverman vs Sharleen MacKay / Jenny Alvarez6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Woodrow vs Julie Diep7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheila Baker / Su Mei Chen vs Stephanie Price / Karen Cederstrom6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-15vs PRC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Moody / Judy Mickelson vs Sharon Kisch / Jennifer Meissner4-6, 1-6
2022-08-08vs SSLT ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJuli Simmermon / Sheila Salyers vs Charla Beram / Winddee Stallings7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-01vs VCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJuli Simmermon / Sheila Salyers vs Yvette Vreeman / Amy Bergan6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Su Mei Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Juli Simmermon
published 3.5
2.90
Sheila Salyers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Leslie Moody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Judy Mickelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Sheila Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Laura Ream
published
Jennifer Woodrow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juli Simmermon + Jennifer Woodrow0541% games−9.7% vs expected
Judy Mickelson + Sheila Baker224 matchesnot enough data
Judy Mickelson + Sheila Salyers123 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Baker + Sheila Salyers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Su Mei Chen
85W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Juli Simmermon
68W–73L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Sheila Salyers
92W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Leslie Moody
49W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Judy Mickelson
35W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Sheila Baker
42W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Laura Ream
48W–47L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Jennifer Woodrow
45W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.