Teams

THaddon (Lifetime)

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-26vs GSmith-Montoya (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Verrill / Amitabh Bhargava vs Lauren Laughton / Jared Ingram6-7, 1-6
2023-07-19vs ERupert (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTanner Haddon / Donna DePollo vs George Lovitt / Elizabeth Heald3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-12vs ESutker (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTanner Haddon / Donna DePollo vs Chase Lyles / Jennifer Anderson4-6, 2-6
2023-07-05vs BGrich (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristin Verrill / Duane Johnson vs Chelse Stevens / Mitchell Hering6-3, 6-1
2023-06-28vs JGoldblatt/CGoldblatt (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmitabh Bhargava / Becky Tennyson vs Josh Goldblatt / Jennifer Gardiner7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-21vs AZelepouga (Life Time)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTanner Haddon / Donna DePollo vs Krista Reardon / Josh Oxendine7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristin Verrill / Amitabh Bhargava vs Anatoly Zelepouga / Karen Rocchio4-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs LNali (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristin Verrill / Richard Merino vs Arjun Som Sekhar / Michelle Wright6-3, 7-6
2023-06-01vs JVarn (Palisades)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Tennyson / Richard Merino vs Tanya Hecht / Keenan Ahern5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.24
Richard Merino
published
4.22
Amitabh Bhargava
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Christopher Gardner
published 4.5
4.10
Kristin Verrill
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.03
Becky Tennyson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Donna DePollo
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Cameron Green
published 4
Eric Winn
published
Tanner Haddon
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carson Rose Tennyson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
Richard Merino
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Amitabh Bhargava
59W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Christopher Gardner
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Kristin Verrill
95W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Becky Tennyson
120W–80L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Donna DePollo
106W–74L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Cameron Green
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Eric Winn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanner Haddon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.