Teams

Wetz

Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5M

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-16vs RossWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdward Welch / Oscar Rodriguez vs Ryan King / Cecil Ross6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrint Harmon / Adrian Barnes vs Tommy LaFon / Drew Wallace7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRob Houser / Joshua Tanner vs Scott Gibbs / Damon Scott Cotton7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-08Won 21
L#1 DoublesGreg Pearson / Brint Harmon vs CODY CAULEY / Ryan King2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEdward Welch / Oscar Rodriguez vs Srikanth Podaralla / Bryan Vincent6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRob Houser / Brady Wetz vs Shon Jones / Robert Black6-3, 6-4
2026-02-24vs NagelLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Welch / Adrian Barnes vs Ryan Barnes / Dustin Hayden4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrint Harmon / Ryan Newlin vs Zack Burnes / Beau Theimer3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRob Houser / Brady Wetz vs Neil Granath / Eric Nagel0-6, 1-6
2026-02-17vs SwartzWon 20
W#1 DoublesOscar Rodriguez / Edward Welch vs Kenneth Perret / Kent Nally7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRob Houser / Todd Dornhecker vs Will Lightfoot / Chris Cole6-4, 6-3
2026-02-03vs NagelLost 12
W#1 DoublesOscar Rodriguez / Edward Welch vs Wesley Pullig / Eric Nagel6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRyan Newlin / Caleb Felts vs Neil Granath / Beau Theimer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTodd Dornhecker / Brint Harmon vs Zack Burnes / Ryan Barnes2-6, 1-6
2026-01-29vs SwartzWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaleb Felts / Brint Harmon vs Bruce Swartz / Dave Schaller6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Edward Welch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Caleb Felts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Brint Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Ryan Newlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Todd Dornhecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Rob Houser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Oscar Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Welch + Oscar Rodriguez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edward Welch
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Caleb Felts
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brint Harmon
33W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Ryan Newlin
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Todd Dornhecker
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
Rob Houser
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Oscar Rodriguez
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.