Teams

PTC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-01vs GAC GOLDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKim Sullivan / Kari Miceli vs Kingsley Parsley / Kirsten Handler0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Jan McCaffrey7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPam Hascall / Kristin Daharb vs Tanya Maierhofer / Suzanne Martinek2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHelen Nelson vs Debbie Yoon2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Watson / Seema Shah vs Debbie Ford / Rebecca Hite2-6, 5-7
2021-05-25vs GCC BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesLiz Epstein Smith / Elizabeth Watson vs Michelle Belitz / Shannon Johnson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Jamie Harris2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Wilson / Jody Fidler vs Lisa Adams / Heidi Wolfe5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJacqueline Hampton vs Keli Loehr1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Franzen / Helen Nelson vs Jennifer Steelman / Laura Yeros0-6, 0-6
2021-05-25vs CACM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesJody Fidler / Pam Hascall vs Sarah Gieringer / Carlie Odau3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Susan Foulkes6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Watson / Jacqueline Hampton vs Susan Ham / Liza Butterfield0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHelen Nelson vs Jennifer Armstrong3-6, 1-6
2021-05-18vs SSH GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLiz Epstein Smith / Pam Hascall vs Angie Sanders / Tanya Taylor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Hampton vs Carmencita Lewis4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Franzen / Elizabeth Watson vs Bea Barnes / Sherri Kelleher3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJody Fidler / Amanda Meier vs Joey Rothman / Chris Darrow7-6
2021-05-04vs CHCC GREENWon 32
L#1 DoublesPam Hascall / Liz Epstein Smith vs Kelly Osborn / Adrine Writer3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Meier vs Maureen Kechriotis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Watson / Kari Miceli vs Christina Caulkins / Amy Dimarco6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Hampton vs Julie Meredith5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Franzen / Helen Nelson vs Marcy White / Wendy Croney2-6, 4-6
2021-04-27vs HFII BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesJody Fidler / Liz Epstein Smith vs Julie Garside / Audra Ramsey5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Hampton vs Diane Vartuli1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKim Sullivan / Kari Miceli vs Clare Ambrose / Kristi Piazza4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHelen Nelson vs Sandra Stephenson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Meier / Pam Hascall vs Lauren Rundell / Megann Rundell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-20vs LTFC GOLDLost 14
W#1 DoublesLiz Epstein Smith / Elizabeth Watson vs Hanne Schauer / Lauren Ford6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Hampton vs Elizabeth Hansen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJody Fidler / Kim Franzen vs Yvette Watson / Karen Wangaard1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHelen Nelson vs Annie Ross4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKari Miceli / Kim Sullivan vs Valerie Koenig / Jazmin Smith4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amanda Meier
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Anne Reese
published 4
3.54
Liz Epstein Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jacqueline Hampton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Helen Nelson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jody Fidler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kari Miceli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Franzen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Daharb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pam Hascall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Seema Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Hascall + Kristin Daharb1734% games−12.6% vs expected
Jody Fidler + Liz Epstein Smith1637% gamesnot enough data
Pam Hascall + Jody Fidler123 matchesnot enough data
Pam Hascall + Liz Epstein Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Meier
62W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Anne Reese
30W–46L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Liz Epstein Smith
31W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Jacqueline Hampton
13W–33L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Helen Nelson
4W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jody Fidler
9W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kari Miceli
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Franzen
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Daharb
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Pam Hascall
12W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Seema Shah
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.