Teams

El.Robinson18S

2026 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-19vs Ta.Yasin18S3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMaeve Gardner vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Ferrell vs Taqiyya Yasin0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesBlair Cobb vs Brandi Washington6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Kane18S1021216
2Am.Brandon18S1021217
3Sh.Clarkson18S1021323
4El.Robinson18S0112426
5St.Gupton18S0112427
6Ha.Hughes18S0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Sheri Erhart
published 3
2.50
Emily Funderburk
published
2.49
Melissa Ferrell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Greyson McGrail
published
2.46
Blair Cobb
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Merrit Lumsden
published 3
2.17
Maeve Gardner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina LeLiever
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Emily Funderburk
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Melissa Ferrell
2W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Greyson McGrail
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Blair Cobb
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
3
Merrit Lumsden
16W–34L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
Maeve Gardner
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.