Teams

Kahler/Pederson

2025 IA 40 & Over Adult Mixed League · 8.0 Mixed

17 players · average NTRP 3.79 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-30vs BradfieldLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Rohr / Serina Sulentic vs Richard Heil / Angela Torgerson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSachin Yawalkar / Andrea Heffernan vs Brent Hanson / Andi Laine3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Armstrong / Katie Kahler vs Sebastien Feve / Jennifer Heil4-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesSerina Sulentic / Brian Rohr vs Rachel Morrissey / Nathan Johnston5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSachin Yawalkar / Andrea Heffernan vs Dawn Ver Steeg / Jim Sichterman6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Kahler / Steve Armstrong vs Justin Despotovich / Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf4-6, 1-6
2025-02-28vs Rath/SundermannLost 02
L#1 DoublesThushan Hemachandra / Andrea Heffernan vs Jennifer Kemmerer / Mike Strydom3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Kahler / Bryan Goettel vs Daniel Jones / Michelle Novak2-6, 3-6
2025-02-16vs BradfieldWon 21
W#1 DoublesThushan Hemachandra / Andrea Heffernan vs Ronald Bradfield / Jennifer Heil7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Kahler / Bryan Goettel vs Pedro Gonzalez / Andrea Arias1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSachin Yawalkar / Germaine Hagarty vs Rachel Morgan / Richard Heil7-6, 6-2
2025-02-02vs Rath/SundermannLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Torgerson / Kevin Davison vs Daniel Jones / Jennifer Kemmerer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSachin Yawalkar / Germaine Hagarty vs Ryan Murphy / Tricia Miller7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Rohr / Julie Houston vs Terry Shie / Kim Sherman4-6, 6-7
2025-01-19vs IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesFred Pedersen / Jennifer Torgerson vs Michael Boyer / Anne Pham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Steckel / Serina Sulentic vs Justin Despotovich / Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThushan Hemachandra / Germaine Hagarty vs Brandon Willett / Amy Upright3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0X601539128
2Rath/Sundermann4212614160
3Bradfield1571124180
4Kahler/Pederson1521632209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Trisha Welter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Katie Kahler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Sachin Yawalkar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.90
Brian Rohr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Serina Sulentic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Cindy Klebe
published 4
Carlos Medina
published 4
Fred Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Mark Steckel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Jennifer Torgerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Julie Houston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Andrea Heffernan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Germaine Hagarty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Bryan Goettel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Steve Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Davison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thushan Hemachandra
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Heffernan + Sachin Yawalkar3448% games−1.9% vs expected
Jennifer Torgerson + Brian Rohr2450% gamesnot enough data
Mark Steckel + Katie Kahler134 matchesnot enough data
Sachin Yawalkar + Germaine Hagarty224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Rohr + Serina Sulentic033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trisha Welter
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Katie Kahler
35W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Sachin Yawalkar
13W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Brian Rohr
49W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Serina Sulentic
44W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Cindy Klebe
31W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Carlos Medina
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Fred Pedersen
3W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Steckel
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Jennifer Torgerson
41W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Julie Houston
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Andrea Heffernan
66W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Germaine Hagarty
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Bryan Goettel
2W–8L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Steve Armstrong
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kevin Davison
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thushan Hemachandra
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.