Teams

MD.Scroggins

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 5.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-01vs TOHS.FriedmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Scroggins / Karen Merchant vs Brittany Rook / Ines Murman6-0, 6-0
2023-09-17vs TOC.AroraSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Ashley Hill / Katy Rapp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Kemp / Karen Merchant vs Vibha Arora / Jennifer Waychoff3-6, 6-7
2023-09-10vs TOHS.FriedmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesShelley Dawson / Kelly Pfrommer vs Ines Murman / Danelle Alex6-7, 6-7
2023-09-03vs TOC.HollettWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Klingemann / Katie Scroggins vs Audrey Hollett / Joanna Valler6-2, 6-2
2023-08-20vs TOHS.FriedmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Pfrommer / Laurie Godfrey vs Claudia Bownes / Ines Murman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-13vs TOC.HollettWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Klingemann / Erin Riddick vs Audrey Hollett / Tracy Lowrance6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Susan Newton
published
3.07
Colleen Davis
published 3.5
3.00
Erin Riddick
published
2.98
Karen Merchant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.94
Katie Klingemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Katy Rapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Deanna Hart
published 3
2.41
Laurie Godfrey
published
2.35
Mary Ashley Hill
published
2.31
Kelly Pfrommer
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Riddick + Karen Merchant314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Klingemann + Karen Merchant303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Newton
29W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Colleen Davis
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Erin Riddick
27W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Karen Merchant
87W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Katie Klingemann
96W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Katy Rapp
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Deanna Hart
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Laurie Godfrey
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.41
Mary Ashley Hill
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Kelly Pfrommer
27W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.