Teams

PW.Moore

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-02vs TOC.TurnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlan Roberts / Edwal Stone vs William Adams / Claude Ruffieux3-6, 4-6
2023-07-26vs TOC.NewsomeLost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Larrichio / Gaurav Luther vs Patrick Newsome / Richard McClenny6-7, 7-5
2023-07-19vs TOC.VeerappanWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Larrichio / Alex Newman vs Ramesh Veerappan / Ramana Sodem6-1, 6-2
2023-07-12vs MD.JenningsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Newman / Tom Larrichio vs Andrew Ligay / Jerfi Cicin6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEdwal Stone / Joshua Moore vs James Moriarty / Thomas Ainsley6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Newman / Tom Larrichio vs David Anderson / William Anderson6-2, 6-2
2023-06-21vs TOC.MorrowLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdwal Stone / Mark Heron vs W Troutman / Lawrence Brock1-6, 2-6
2023-06-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Newman / Edwal Stone vs Joseph Kiertekles / Kevin Martell5-7, 5-7
2023-05-24vs TOC.XuLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Newman / Edwal Stone vs Patrick Grant / Justin Fowler7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Gaurav Luther
published 4.5
4.02
Tom Larrichio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Abhi Bhirud
published 4.5
3.84
Ryan Kessler
published
3.80
Edwal Stone
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Julio Perez
published
3.68
Joshua Moore
published
3.55
Bill Nagel
published 4
3.54
Mark Heron
published
3.32
Frank Schneider
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Nagel + Mark Heron033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Tom Larrichio
132W–95L career · 4 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.02
4.5
Abhi Bhirud
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.88
Ryan Kessler
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Edwal Stone
51W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Julio Perez
24W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Joshua Moore
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Bill Nagel
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Mark Heron
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Frank Schneider
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.