Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0M/Daw/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Heist / Andrew Palafox vs Steven Haynes / James McCleland3-6, 3-6
2025-07-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Shiloff / Charles Heist vs Robert Burns / Kevin Woodson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill White
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Clay Lowenfield
published 3.5
3.01
Bill Ruddock
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3
Charles Heist
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Andrew Palafox
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Edgar Borrego
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 6% · published
Greg Daw
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Javier Navarro
usually #1 Singles 32%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Paul Leslie
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
ROBERT DUNLOP
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Richard Lyon
published
Richard Overley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Stuart Shiloff
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Leslie + Bill White7455% games+9.2% vs expected
Greg Daw + Edgar Borrego4346% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leslie + Greg Daw3349% gamesnot enough data
Paul Leslie + ROBERT DUNLOP3250% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Shiloff + Paul Leslie134 matchesnot enough data
Stuart Shiloff + Edgar Borrego044 matchesnot enough data
Paul Leslie + Andrew Palafox044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Lyon + Richard Overley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill White
28W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Clay Lowenfield
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bill Ruddock
73W–81L career · 37 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Charles Heist
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrew Palafox
9W–24L career · 16 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Edgar Borrego
24W–36L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Daw
65W–75L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Javier Navarro
28W–22L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Leslie
85W–78L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
ROBERT DUNLOP
27W–37L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Lyon
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Overley
11W–43L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stuart Shiloff
14W–44L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.