Teams

Dill/IKnoxville

2025 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 8.5 Women Combo Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-29vs DouglasWon 21
L#1 DoublesKate Willis / Barbara Miller vs Lindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Katie Rymer vs Paige Brown / Robin Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmanda Wilson / Brooke Browning vs Carrie Hayes / Erin Upshaw2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-20vs DouglasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Elison / Katie Rymer vs Lindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Lorino / Brooke Browning vs Tori Hayes / Erin Upshaw6-0, 6-2
2025-09-18vs DouglasLost 12
W#1 DoublesRachel Kimmel / Barbara Miller vs Wendy Petty / Marissa Turner6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJasmine Dabbs / Jennifer Brady vs Erin Upshaw / Sarah Ross3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTara Hurley / Amanda Wilson vs Lindsey Stimets / Robin Smith2-6, 6-7
2025-09-15vs DouglasLost 02
L#1 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Lauren Clarke vs Jennifer Oakley / Kristie Danby4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Dill / Tara Hurley vs Lindsey Stimets / Sarah Ross1-6, 2-6
2025-09-05vs DouglasWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Lorino / Brooke Browning vs Lindsey Stimets / Kristie Danby6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMisty Cottrell / Jasmine Dabbs vs Paige Brown / Robin Smith2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Kimmel / Barbara Miller vs Jennifer Oakley / Wendy Petty6-0, 6-4
2025-08-09vs DouglasWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Rymer / Emily Elison vs Jennifer Douglas / Paige Brown6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKate Willis / Morgan Smith vs Sarah Ross / Carrie Hayes7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Miller / Karen Lorino vs Kristie Danby / Tori Hayes6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Karen Lorino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Brooke Dill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Misty Cottrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Rachel Kimmel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Kate Willis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Brooke Browning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Tara Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Lauren Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Jasmine Dabbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Emily Elison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Katie Rymer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Lorino + Kate Willis8174% games+9.7% vs expected
Misty Cottrell + Rachel Kimmel7162% gamesnot enough data
Tara Hurley + Brooke Browning404 matchesnot enough data
Misty Cottrell + Kate Willis404 matchesnot enough data
Tara Hurley + Jasmine Dabbs303 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Browning + Karen Lorino303 matchesnot enough data
Emily Elison + Katie Rymer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Lorino
24W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Brooke Dill
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Misty Cottrell
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Rachel Kimmel
24W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Kate Willis
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
4
Brooke Browning
21W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Tara Hurley
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Lauren Clarke
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jasmine Dabbs
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Katie Rymer
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.