Teams

Brewer/Thomas (S)

2021 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2021-05-02vs Mrazek/Davis (SD)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Butler / Ann Finnegan vs Kimberly Hammond / ERIN MASSEY6-3, 6-3
2021-04-25vs Brennan (S)Won 10
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Kate Walkenhorst5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-18vs Fridley (S)Won 21
L#1 SinglesSarah Wilson vs TRISHA VERSTAPPEN6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Kathy Arnold6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Mower / Lori Cummins vs Linda Ross / Megan-Elizabeth Mueller6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-11vs Short/Boyd (S)Won 31
W#1 DoublesCarey Moore / Kim Mower vs Louann Boyd / Kathryn Droege6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Robyn Bradbury0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Wilson vs Susan Riemann6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristina Reilly / Ann Finnegan vs Laura Smith / Tak Chu6-4, 5-3
2021-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Butler / Ann Finnegan vs Jane Doe / Barbara Forrest3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-03-14vs Durbala/Austin (S)Won 21
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Maya Horsford6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Thomas / Kim Mower vs Egle Gherardini / Teresa Durbala3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Grigg / Shawna Shearburn vs Anita Selke / Sandy Destefano6-0, 6-1
2021-03-07vs Daws (S)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesSarah Wilson vs Clarissa Allen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Butler / Ann Finnegan vs Sarah Hoff / Elizabeth Allen1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-02-28vs Rhoads (S)Won 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Grigg / Shawna Shearburn vs Patty Roddy / Sisa Meksap0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Angela Reckelhoff6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Butler / Ann Finnegan vs Patti Guidroz / Cindy Rapponotti6-3, 6-1
2021-02-21vs STL/Blake/Cody/18&Over3.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSara Nations / Kim Mower vs Michelle Faust / Kelly Rechtlich6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Wilson vs Cary Eldridge1-6, 4-6
2021-02-14vs Peterson/Millonas (SD)Split 11
L#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Haina Shin5-7, 0-5
W#3 DoublesShawna Shearburn / Cindy Grigg vs Joanne Langan / Frances Epplin6-0, 6-2
2021-02-07vs Ross/Rehnquist (S)Split 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wilken / Lori Schreck vs Jill Ince / Karla Borgerding6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Ellie Jablonowski6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Mower / Lori Cummins vs Joey Wilmsen / Mary Mounts6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSarah Wilson vs Diane Wilson2-6, 1-6
2021-01-31vs Hoxsey (S)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wilken / Kim Mower vs Mary Moore / Elena Breer5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Wilson vs Kaitlin Lamack7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-01-24vs Stobie/Causey (S)Won 20
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Marcie Dick6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShawna Shearburn / Cindy Grigg vs Lolly Cottrell / Kathy Ruggeri6-3, 6-4
2021-01-17vs Borghi/Steinhart (SD)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Wilken / Lori Schreck vs Jill Kunkel / Mary Steinhart7-6, 5-3
W#1 SinglesTiffany Johnson vs Deborah Wagner6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brewer/Thomas (S)123472862593
2Peterson/Covington (S)123482763564
3Durbala/Austin (S)123462970609
4Short/Boyd (S)114453072618
5Brennan (S)105472868612
6Fridley (S)105433279643
7AuBuchon/Blades (S)96403580673
8Stobie/Causey (S)96383783669
9Daws (S)87443174639
10Ross/Rehnquist (S)78403580646
11Hoxsey (S)69324395706
12McIntire/McNealy (S)510314496698
13Mehner/Hammond (S)411334293735
14Rhoads (S)312294699693
15Steinhart/Borghi (S)1141956119809
16Albrecht/Criner (S)1141857120800

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Katie Eichholz
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Sara Nations
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.65
Soophia Naydenov
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.61
Lori Cummins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Tiffany Johnson
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
3.55
Carey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.44
Jennifer Wilken
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.43
Lori Schreck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Ann Finnegan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Denise Cronin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Shawna Shearburn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Cindy Grigg
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.04
Kristina Reilly
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Kim Mower
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Butler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Sarah Wilson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Finnegan + Melissa Butler9164% games+12.4% vs expected
Sara Nations + Jennifer Wilken6358% games+12.2% vs expected
Lori Cummins + Kim Mower12163% games+10.4% vs expected
Patricia Thomas + Melissa Butler20856% games+5.7% vs expected
Carey Moore + Lori Cummins13955% games+5.0% vs expected
Kristina Reilly + Carey Moore201354% games+4.6% vs expected
Lori Cummins + Jennifer Wilken11952% games+4.1% vs expected
Lori Cummins + Sara Nations1452% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Eichholz
131W–70L career · 12 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Sara Nations
87W–76L career · 15 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Soophia Naydenov
98W–55L career · 11 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lori Cummins
107W–74L career · 12 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61
Tiffany Johnson
102W–78L career · 9 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Carey Moore
113W–120L career · 20 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Wilken
133W–131L career · 17 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
Lori Schreck
45W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Ann Finnegan
118W–79L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Denise Cronin
95W–73L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Shawna Shearburn
59W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Grigg
131W–98L career · 14 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Kristina Reilly
144W–132L career · 13 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kim Mower
46W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Brewer
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Melissa Butler
67W–19L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Thomas
49W–39L career · 12 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Wilson
10W–16L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.