Teams

SHC-Farrell/Kang

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Marcus Kroloff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Jeroen Swanborn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Chris Eddy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Brian Theobald
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Jason Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.70
Sam Bradshaw
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Pete Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Caplan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Don Ormsby
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-06-22Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Sam Bradshaw vs Steven Baer / Bret Kean6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrian Theobald vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHector M Salomon / Jason Crawford vs Ernie Levenson / Warren Hill6-3, 6-3
2024-06-15Split 22
W#1 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Sam Bradshaw vs Cristian Crisan / Jeff Lewis7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Sheng Saechao6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChris Eddy / Marcus Kroloff vs Robert Ferek / Kelly Small6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Christensen / Jonathan Caplan vs Tim Luangrath / Tony Khamsouk3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-06-08Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Hector M Salomon vs Doug Post / Robert Torch4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Ben Merritt6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMark Stephenson / Russ DeMoss vs Jim Fredericks / Ken Schwerd6-1, 6-2
2024-06-02Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / William Anderson vs Brent Grubb / Keith Johnson6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Alex Simpson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGeorge Heilig / Chris Eddy vs Willis Boyer / William Malloch3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-19Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJae Joon Kang / Marcus Kroloff vs Gregg Palmer / Zhitong Chen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeroen Swanborn / Sam Bradshaw vs Ken Avenoso / Patrick Brewer7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJonathan Caplan / Bill Christensen vs Chuck Gooding / Eric Goldner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-27Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHector M Salomon / Jason Crawford vs Scott Eliason / Robert Ferek6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Sheng Saechao6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMike Farrell / Russ DeMoss vs John Christiaan / David Richardson7-6, 6-2
2024-04-21Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcus Kroloff / Pete Stirling vs Brad Wade / Nishant Lakshman6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Bryan Gonzalvo6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Chris Eddy vs Michael Ollinger / Eric Means6-1, 6-1
2024-04-14Won 21
W#1 DoublesJae Joon Kang / Marcus Kroloff vs Kevin Heller / Paul Stutzman6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPete Stirling / Jason Crawford vs Stefan Olander / Nate Look6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Chris Eddy vs Kok Waii Wong / Matt Chesley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Marcus Kroloff
33W–11L career
0%86%14%
3.94
4
Jeroen Swanborn
67W–46L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Chris Eddy
63W–53L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Brian Theobald
13W–15L career
not enough data
4
Jason Crawford
33W–25L career
not enough data
4
Sam Bradshaw
30W–19L career
4%96%0%
3.70
4
Pete Stirling
23W–16L career
7%93%0%
3.66
4
Jonathan Caplan
37W–61L career
24%76%0%
3.54
4
Don Ormsby
21W–45L career
58%42%0%
3.41
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.