← Teams

SJRC-Bracken

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nate Larsen
published 4
3.37
Alex McIntosh
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Andy Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Huy Bui
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott Naugler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.75
William Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Manuel Garcia-Fernandez
published 0
—
Peter Hoang
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 0
Results10 ties
2020-03-01Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesAndy Bracken / Manuel Garcia-Fernandez vs Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal / Vidyanand Kulkarni6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Hoang / John Nguyen vs Sanjoy Ganguly / Vivek Kashyap6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlex McIntosh vs Dinesh Jayaraj6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHuy Bui / Nate Larsen vs Nagaraj Sathyanarayan / Amrut Kapare4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-02-22Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesScott Naugler / William Seidl vs George Husbands / Jeffrey Gates6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Nguyen / Peter Hoang vs Corin Nies / D Michael Jones6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHuy Bui / Nate Larsen vs Jeff Anhaltzer / Paul Barner6-1, 6-2
2020-02-15Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Nguyen / Peter Hoang vs Ryan Rissler / Ramon Tuason4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlex McIntosh vs Patrick Clancy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHuy Bui / Manuel Garcia-Fernandez vs Bradley Perry / Doug Birch6-2, 2-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Joshua Roehrich vs Greg Brophy / Robert Affleck7-5, 6-3
2020-02-08Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAndy Bracken / Huy Bui vs Matt Zhou / Craig Frasier6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-02-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKyle McGovern / Huy Bui vs Stephen Mileham / Tony Humpage6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Hoang / John Nguyen vs Jeffrey Bayless / Glenn Eisen6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesScott Naugler vs Raimund Grube6-2, 6-3
2020-01-26Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesWilliam Seidl / Peter Hoang vs Arun Sundaram / Hoover Li6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndy Bracken / Huy Bui vs John Liao / John Lu3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesScott Naugler vs Michael da Silva3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex McIntosh / Nate Larsen vs Ryan Manwiller / Frank Brown4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-01-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesManuel Garcia-Fernandez / Alex McIntosh vs David Butts / Robert Wise6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndy Bracken / Huy Bui vs Craig Hlady / John van Leeuwen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2020-01-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesHuy Bui / Andy Bracken vs Neville Mehta / Gabriel Weaver6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlex McIntosh / William Seidl vs Marko Radosavljevic / Randolph Splitter6-3, 6-4
2019-12-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesCarly Vendegna / Huy Bui vs Sarah Robertson / Kendall Acheson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2019-12-13Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesHuy Bui / Parish Burns vs Erin Casey / William Seidl6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nate Larsen
27W–11L career
0%99%1%
3.80
3.5
Alex McIntosh
86W–75L career
0%96%4%
3.37
3.5
Andy Bracken
59W–57L career
0%96%4%
3.35
3.5
Huy Bui
108W–61L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Scott Naugler
106W–59L career
1%99%0%
3.21
3
William Seidl
58W–56L career
3%96%1%
2.75
0
Manuel Garcia-Fernandez
19W–9L career
not enough data
—
0
Peter Hoang
8W–24L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.