Teams

Raymond/40's/3.0AW/For

2026 Monroe Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-25vs Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 30
W#1 DoublesFelicia Hardwick / Sarah Raymond vs Amy Taylor / Stacey Majure6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndi Holyfield vs Mary Durham6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAimee Hayward / Brandee Yarbrough vs Jessica Stutts / Erin Klitzke6-0, 6-0
2026-03-21vs Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Robinson / Amy Robinson vs Hope Robertson / Lisa Livigni7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesFelicia Hardwick vs Melissa Touchet6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndree Eddleman / Tiffany Turpin vs Erin Klitzke / Jessica Stutts6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Raymond / Andi Holyfield vs Amy Taylor / Stacey Majure6-1, 6-1
2026-03-05vs Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/MacWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrandee Yarbrough / Aimee Hayward vs Mary Durham / Melissa Touchet6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCindy Gibson vs Jennifer Turpin6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Robinson / Amy Robinson vs Lisa Livigni / Hope Robertson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndree Eddleman / Tiffany Turpin vs Jessica Stutts / Erin Klitzke6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Monroe (40&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Raymond/40's/3.0AW/For30120045
2Klitzke/40's/3.0AW/Mac0301224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Tiffany Turpin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Brandee Yarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.01
Cindy Gibson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Andi Holyfield
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.98
Andree Eddleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Aimee Hayward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Sarah Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Anna Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Felicia Hardwick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Amy Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Turpin
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brandee Yarbrough
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Cindy Gibson
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Andi Holyfield
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Andree Eddleman
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Aimee Hayward
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Sarah Raymond
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Anna Robinson
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Felicia Hardwick
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Amy Robinson
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.