Teams

40 & Over M3.5-Versalles-Eddie Lozada

Adult 40 & Over 2021 · Adult Mens 40& Over 3.5-Flight 2

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesNelson Gerena / Jaime Martorell vs Armando Torres-Nieves / Fernando Valverde6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs Francisco Millan6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2021-08-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs CESAR ROSARIO6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs Sergio Molina6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKenneth Thompson / Jaime Martorell vs Guillermo Toledo / Julio E Roman Perez6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs Graham Wong6-3, 6-3
L#4 DoublesKenneth Thompson / Jaime Martorell vs Emisael Torres / Jose Sierra-Pagan1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesNelson Gerena / Jaime Martorell vs Alfred Diaz / Victor Tirado6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs Jorge Ruiz Montilla6-2, 6-1
L#4 DoublesNelson Gerena / Jaime Martorell vs Manuel Rivera / Douglas Pennock6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJosaphat Martinez vs Jorge Soler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJaime Martorell / Nelson Gerena vs Sergio Molina / Antonio Manuel del Toro6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Mens 40& Over 3.5-Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Josaphat Martinez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.49
Milton Pringle
published
3.40
Jaime Martorell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Eddie Lozada
published 3.5
Bienvenido Velez
published 3.5
Eduardo Juan
published 3.5
Jaime Morales
published 3.5
Marcos Fernandez
published
Nelson Gerena
published
Ramon Santiago
published
Tony Fas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Lozada + Nelson Gerena4552% games−2.6% vs expected
Jaime Morales + Eduardo Juan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josaphat Martinez
37W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.94
Milton Pringle
45W–46L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Jaime Martorell
21W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Eddie Lozada
61W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Bienvenido Velez
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Eduardo Juan
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jaime Morales
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marcos Fernandez
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nelson Gerena
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ramon Santiago
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tony Fas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.