Teams

Meg's Team

2022 Adult 70 and Over League · 6.5 W

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-01-08vs Larie's TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Brotzman / Ellen Higa vs Carolyn Goff / Larie Kent6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Gleason / Donna Moore vs Charlotte Etling / Elaine Reed4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMildred Kaneshiro / Donna Duryea vs KATHLEEN OLDFATHER / June Taguma3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-12-23vs Lynne's TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Brotzman / Donna Duryea vs Barbara Nagata / Ipolani Wright3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJane Iida / Meg Saunders vs Gloria Gomez / Jane Markham6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEllen Higa / Donna Moore vs Jeanne Harano-Hernandez / Aiko Mitchel1-6, 1-6
2022-12-11vs Lynne's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesMeg Saunders / Ellen Higa vs Aiko Mitchel / Jeanne Harano-Hernandez2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMildred Kaneshiro / Anne Gleason vs Jane Markham / Ipolani Wright6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Iida / Donna Moore vs Lynne Miura / Gloria Gomez6-4, 6-3
2022-12-08vs Larie's TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Higa / Mildred Kaneshiro vs Charlotte Etling / Carolyn Goff3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Duryea / Jane Iida vs June Taguma / Larie Kent1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Gleason / Meg Saunders vs Eunice Hashimoto / KATHLEEN OLDFATHER6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Brotzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Anne Gleason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Meg Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Ellen Higa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Donna Duryea
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.16
Jane Iida
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Mildred Kaneshiro
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Saunders + Amy Brotzman0533% gamesnot enough data
Donna Duryea + Jane Iida044 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Higa + Amy Brotzman123 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Higa + Anne Gleason123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Duryea + Mildred Kaneshiro123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Brotzman
30W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Anne Gleason
61W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Meg Saunders
43W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Ellen Higa
48W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Donna Duryea
14W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Jane Iida
35W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Mildred Kaneshiro
33W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.