Teams

Samples

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Combined

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-05vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa LaRose / David Dye vs Julie Miller / Joseph Delsignore4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Jett / Jim Schwartz vs Nicholas Damato / Jane Herder1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Samples / Bob Samples vs Martina Augsburger / James Richter5-7, 1-6
2023-09-28vs Comfortably Numb (Shouldis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa LaRose / Marvin Bohnenkamp vs Pamela Holman / Matthew Mertens6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Jett / Jim Schwartz vs Kelly Rechtlich / Peter Rechtlich6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Samples / Bob Samples vs Kristina Reilly / Eric Martin6-1, 6-0
2023-09-14vs Comfortably Numb (Shouldis)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMarvin Bohnenkamp / Lisa LaRose vs Matthew Mertens / Pamela Holman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Schwartz / Lisa Jett vs Kelly Rechtlich / Peter Rechtlich6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Samples / Bob Samples vs Kristina Reilly / Kurt Feigley6-2, 6-3
2023-09-07vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Marvin Bohnenkamp vs William Dannevik / Michelle Brower-Kitchens3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa LaRose / David Dye vs Sam Shouldis / Denise Foley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShashi Pathak / Barry Sage vs Martina Augsburger / James Richter1-6, 0-6
2023-08-24vs Comfortably Numb (Shouldis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa LaRose / David Dye vs Kristina Reilly / Kurt Feigley7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Jett / Jim Schwartz vs Pamela Holman / Matthew Mertens4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Samples / Bob Samples vs Randy Ring / Ellen Mrazek6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-22vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Samples / Bob Samples vs Julie Miller / Sam Shouldis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShashi Pathak / Barry Sage vs Martina Augsburger / William Dannevik3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Marvin Bohnenkamp vs Michelle Brower-Kitchens / James Richter1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Shouldis/55&Over7.0MXD511539115
2Samples2471124175
3Comfortably Numb (Shouldis)2451328199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Bob Samples
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
David Dye
published 3.5
3.18
Lisa LaRose
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Kelly Samples
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Barry Sage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.75
Shashi Pathak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jim Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Jett
published
Marvin Bohnenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marvin Bohnenkamp + Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp7751% games+3.5% vs expected
Bob Samples + Kelly Samples211456% games+0.5% vs expected
Lisa Jett + Jim Schwartz6263% gamesnot enough data
Barry Sage + Shashi Pathak044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa LaRose + Marvin Bohnenkamp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bob Samples
79W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
David Dye
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa LaRose
78W–126L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Kelly Samples
151W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Barry Sage
18W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.85
Shashi Pathak
109W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Jim Schwartz
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Jett
29W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marvin Bohnenkamp
17W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp
58W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.