Teams

Rauhofer - Volley Girls

2024 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-13vs FORD 40+Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Bream vs Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-7, 2-2
2024-06-06vs FORD 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKate Fleming / Beth van Derslice vs Kimberly Ford / Kimberly Sandhu1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCara Ober / Karen Bream vs Eva Simmons-O'Brien / Jean Acuna1-6, 0-6
2024-06-04vs FORD 40+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCarisa Husak / Allison Stockbridge vs Kimberly Ford / Michele Rosenstein4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElena Lee / Cara Ober vs Jennifer Exelby / Roxanna Nemec0-6, 0-6
2024-05-29vs FORD 40+Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBeth van Derslice vs Jennifer Exelby0-6, 2-6
2024-05-22vs FORD 40+Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKaren Bream vs Katie Tetrault1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarisa Husak / Cara Ober vs Kimberly Ford / Kimberly Sandhu0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElena Lee / Kathleen Schaffner vs Jean Acuna / Laura Bull7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-21vs FORD 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Fleming / Beth van Derslice vs Sanghee Lee / Julie Edwards6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Bream vs Kimberly Ford6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCara Ober / Elena Lee vs Laura Bull / Michele Rosenstein3-6, 1-6
2024-05-05vs FORD 40+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesKate Fleming / Beth van Derslice vs Rebecca Stewart / Rita Piel3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Bream vs Eva Simmons-O'Brien6-3, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTy Cronin / Steffie Cannella Beck vs Michele Rosenstein / Roxanna Nemec1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElena Lee / Carisa Husak vs Jennifer Exelby / Beyza Akcam0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Ty Cronin
published
3.39
Beth van Derslice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Carisa Husak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Elena Lee
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Steffie Cannella Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Karen Bream
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Kathleen Schaffner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Lee + Steffie Cannella Beck044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ty Cronin
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Beth van Derslice
57W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Carisa Husak
56W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Elena Lee
25W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Steffie Cannella Beck
114W–111L career · 1 line in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Karen Bream
172W–196L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kathleen Schaffner
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.