Teams

Wright/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-09vs Blanton/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmber Sand / Jenni Harris vs Sarah Richardson / Beth Price4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch vs Krista Hendrix / Abigail Cardwell6-4, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Justice/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlicia Wright / Kelcie Nollner vs Anna Claire Gleason / Lisa Berryhill6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEstelle Mitchell vs Katie Howell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCristina Guibao / Alecia Monett vs Neely Mcdurmon / Rachel Veteto6-0, 6-0
2026-04-29vs Cleveland/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch vs Cody Lambert / Christa Smith6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlecia Monett vs Peyton Corbin5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Wright / Rachel Spangler vs Madison Cleveland / Lauren Downs6-2, 6-4
2026-04-25vs Nelson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesEstelle Mitchell / Alecia Monett vs Julia McDonald / Allison Palazola6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCristina Guibao vs Cathy Herrington6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClare Moffit / Amber Sand vs Adee Davis / Margaret Roney6-0, 6-1
2026-04-23vs Flynt/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCristina Guibao / Kelcie Nollner vs Dana Daly / Anne Jordan6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesEstelle Mitchell vs Colleen Wilson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJenni Harris / Rachel Spangler vs Christa George / Lauren Colpitts6-1, 6-0
2026-04-15vs JLewis/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesEstelle Mitchell / Clare Moffit vs Terry Bondurant / Barbara Wilson5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCristina Guibao vs Jane Ashley Huey6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJenni Harris / Alicia Wright vs Kim Denbow / Ashley Walker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-15vs SLewis/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Rachel Spangler vs Jennie Silk / Allie Olson Battle6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Upchurch vs Allison King6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJenni Harris / Cristina Guibao vs Mary Allison Becksfort / Marianne Smith6-4, 7-6
2026-03-28vs Taylor/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlecia Monett / Julie Upchurch vs Destiny Taylor / Daniela Wagner1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCristina Guibao vs La Shara Varnell-Smith7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmber Sand / Rachel Spangler vs Corinne Walker / Kelsey Handley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Ray/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch vs Morgan Thornton / Allison Fowler6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCristina Guibao vs Lexi Dickerson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlecia Monett / Jenni Harris vs Surayyah Hasan / Clare Santos4-6, 5-7
2026-03-21vs Biedenharn/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesEstelle Mitchell / Alecia Monett vs Erin Morrison / Shibahn Rodda4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKelcie Nollner vs Shelton Wittenberg4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Upchurch / Rachel Spangler vs Tara Hallie Ware / Whitney Wieck6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Kelcie Nollner
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.36
Estelle Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Alecia Monett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Jenni Harris
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.27
Julie Upchurch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Amber Sand
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Cristina Guibao
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.16
Alicia Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Clare Moffit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Katherine Dorsett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelcie Nollner + Julie Upchurch13458% games+8.7% vs expected
Alicia Wright + Katherine Dorsett0632% games−15.4% vs expected
Cristina Guibao + Estelle Mitchell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelcie Nollner
23W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
2.5
Estelle Mitchell
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Alecia Monett
8W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Jenni Harris
14W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Julie Upchurch
18W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Amber Sand
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Cristina Guibao
12W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.22
2.5
Alicia Wright
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Clare Moffit
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Katherine Dorsett
1W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.