Teams

TTA-E RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-23vs CVTA REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris vs Keaton Howe / Andrew Schifle4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-15vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesHayden Churchill / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs Pranav Barve / Graham Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-08vs BRMST GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesIan Harris / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs John Black / John Hamill7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-25vs CVTA BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris vs Adam Busch / Eric Maier7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Loflin
published 4.5
4.24
Steven Alvarado
published
4.21
Ian Harris
published
4.12
Anthony Garcia
published 4.5
4.08
Philip Dixon-Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Ryan Pelton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anthony Garcia + Ian Harris5649% games+0.2% vs expected
Philip Dixon-Patterson + Ian Harris91447% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Loflin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Alvarado
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Ian Harris
20W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Anthony Garcia
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Philip Dixon-Patterson
62W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Ryan Pelton
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.