Teams

GJTC LSHARP

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-17vs GJTC CKOHLSSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelly Saalwachter / Denise Faber vs Christy Fry / Liz Herzog6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs Sandra Kay Miller1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Hughes / Tracy Hughes vs Lisa Smith / Tina Hulihee2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Henke / Erin Decoursey vs Carla Kohls / Angie Vance6-2, 6-4
2023-07-10vs GJTC CKOHLSLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Mosher / Danielle Martens vs Tracy Keller / Jennifer Thompson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErin Decoursey vs Sandra Kay Miller6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Hughes / Tracy Hughes vs Carla Kohls / Tina Hulihee6-1, 6-4
2023-06-26vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Hopkins / Denise Faber vs Sandra Kay Miller / Carrie Thornton0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesErin Decoursey vs Vicki Schoeber6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDanielle Martens / Katie Mosher vs Karen Snider / Angie Vance6-1, 6-0
2023-06-20vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennie Aubert vs Sandra Kay Miller4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Hughes / Kelly Saalwachter vs Tracy Keller / Jennifer Thompson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Henke / Denise Faber vs Carrie Thornton / Lisa Smith6-1, 7-6
2023-06-14vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Saalwachter / Tammy Hopkins vs Vicki Schoeber / Tina Hulihee4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs Sandra Kay Miller7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Sharp / Tracy Hughes vs Liz Herzog / Jennifer Campbell-Wilson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Decoursey / Heather Hughes vs Carrie Thornton / Lisa Smith5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-12vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Saalwachter / Lisa Sharp vs Carrie Thornton / Jennifer Thompson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Hopkins / Jennie Aubert vs Carla Kohls / Lisa Smith6-4, 6-4
2023-06-05vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 40
W#1 DoublesDanielle Martens / Katie Mosher vs Jennifer Campbell-Wilson / Liz Herzog6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErin Decoursey vs Carla Kohls6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Hughes / Tracy Hughes vs Joely Larsen / Tina Hulihee7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Henke / Denise Faber vs Carrie Thornton / Angie Vance6-4, 6-3
2023-06-01vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 40
W#1 DoublesDanielle Martens / Katie Mosher vs Carla Kohls / Sandra Kay Miller7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennie Aubert vs Jennifer Campbell-Wilson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Saalwachter / Heather Hughes vs Carrie Thornton / Lisa Smith6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTracy Hughes / Denise Faber vs Vicki Schoeber / Angie Vance6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kelley Henke
published
3.79
Kelly Saalwachter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.71
Denise Faber
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Jennie Aubert
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Katie Mosher
published
3.71
Danielle Martens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Tammy Hopkins
published
3.59
Tracy Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Erin Decoursey
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Lisa Sharp
published
Kathy Daniels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Aubert + Kelly Saalwachter7360% games+2.4% vs expected
Tammy Hopkins + Denise Faber2348% games+0.4% vs expected
Lisa Sharp + Denise Faber1440% games−1.4% vs expected
Kelly Saalwachter + Denise Faber6155% games−5.5% vs expected
Lisa Sharp + Tammy Hopkins3253% gamesnot enough data
Jennie Aubert + Erin Decoursey0539% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Hughes + Erin Decoursey224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Hughes + Jennie Aubert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Henke
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4.5
Kelly Saalwachter
80W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Denise Faber
105W–96L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Jennie Aubert
85W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Katie Mosher
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.71
4
Danielle Martens
62W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Tammy Hopkins
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Tracy Hughes
91W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Erin Decoursey
43W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lisa Sharp
15W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathy Daniels
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.