Teams

Fernandez/18/7.5/CWD/BREC

2025 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-03vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherie Welch / Bonnie Adams vs Heather Jayson / Jayne Anderson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Bowman / Kathryn Loveless vs Sarah Nelson / Kristan Fletcher6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Johnson / Laura Hottes vs Anna Price / Ameeneh Langlois6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Walters / Laura Hottes vs Jamie Lewis / Tammy Noonan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Westerfield / Laura Miller vs Kaleigh Porcelli / Rebecca Harrod1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Jenny Kern vs Drew Reilly / Sarah Uhl1-6, 4-6
2025-09-18vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Marie Raiford / Kellye Moody vs Sarah Nelson / Lindsay Jeansonne7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Westerfield / Laura Miller vs Anna Price / Lee Anne Tranchina6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHeather Walters / Bonnie Adams vs Liz McCarthy / Ameeneh Langlois2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-11vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Hottes / Heather Walters vs Jamie Lewis / Mary Barham6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBonnie Adams / Cherie Welch vs Kathryn Baker / Kaleigh Porcelli6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Fernandez / Laura Miller vs Lorraine Peak / Kasey Eglin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-08vs Tranchina/18/7.5/CWD/BOCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJackie Westerfield / Dana Clegg vs Lindsay Jeansonne / Sarah Nelson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKellye Moody / Lisa Marie Raiford vs Shannon Hattier / Heather Jayson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-01vs Lewis/18/7.5/CWD/BRCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeanne Palma / Kimberly Fontenot vs Mary Barham / Tammy Noonan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShawna Gardiner / Patricia Brignac Talbot vs Rebecca Harrod / Kaleigh Porcelli2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Westerfield / Dana Clegg vs Jamie Lewis / Lorraine Peak7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Cherie Welch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Bonnie Adams
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Jackie Westerfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Shawna Gardiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kim Elston
published
3.61
Laura Hottes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Kathryn Loveless
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Lisa Marie Raiford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Keri Gauldin
published
3.54
Jenny Kern
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Bridgette Caruso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Laura Frost
published
3.27
Leslie Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dana Clegg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Patricia Brignac Talbot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Leanne Palma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nicole LaNasa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Kellye Moody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marjorie Person
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Welch + Bonnie Adams404 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Loveless + Lisa Marie Raiford213 matchesnot enough data
Kellye Moody + Lisa Marie Raiford123 matchesnot enough data
Bridgette Caruso + Cherie Welch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cherie Welch
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Bonnie Adams
37W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Jackie Westerfield
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Shawna Gardiner
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Kim Elston
16W–25L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Laura Hottes
31W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kathryn Loveless
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lisa Marie Raiford
28W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Keri Gauldin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jenny Kern
63W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Bridgette Caruso
44W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Laura Frost
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Leslie Fernandez
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Dana Clegg
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Brignac Talbot
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Leanne Palma
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nicole LaNasa
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kellye Moody
9W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Marjorie Person
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.