Teams

MO - Hubbard

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Mobile · 18 & Over 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-01vs MTC - SandsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Moore / Norman Pressley vs Thomas Lockard / George May6-1, 6-2
2025-06-01vs MTC - SandsWon 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Hubbard / Vincent Sciame vs Reggie Oyler / Kyle Hubbard7-6, 6-4
2025-05-31vs MTC - SandsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathan Smith / Jacob Stokes vs Kenny Sands / Thomas Lockard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Hubbard / Vincent Sciame vs Reggie Oyler / Kyle Hubbard7-6, 7-5
2025-05-13vs MTC - SandsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacob Stokes / Nathan Smith vs Kenny Sands / Thomas Lockard7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNorman Pressley / Christian Coney vs George Coate / George May6-3, 6-3
2025-05-01vs MTC - SandsWon 10
W#2 DoublesNorman Pressley / Christian Coney vs George May / George Coate6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Cedric Nitz
published 4.5
4.37
Jacob Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Austin Jackson
published 4.5
3.78
Norman Pressley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alexis Jean
published 4
3.74
Christian Coney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Vincent Sciame
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Elijah Adedoyin
published
3.41
Thomas Jackson
published
Zachary Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cedric Nitz
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
Jacob Stokes
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Austin Jackson
4W–0L career · type D · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Norman Pressley
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Alexis Jean
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christian Coney
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Vincent Sciame
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Elijah Adedoyin
23W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Thomas Jackson
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Zachary Hubbard
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.