Teams

Brown - Congressional 3.0

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-25vs Have A Slice DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesSkye Replogle / Samantha Brown vs Barbara Braffett / Ingrid Martin6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRenata Raeder / Amrita Rai vs Helen Chao / Saira Malik4-6, 2-6
2025-03-21vs Wager-Congressional 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Skye Replogle vs Meaghan LeNard / Kathryn Powell5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaura Gordy / Carolyn Ruyak vs Alison Wager / Emily Warke6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Doyle / Anne-Marie Coakley vs Courtney Jaeger / Kristin Stipicevic2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-14vs Manor 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarina Bartozzi / Samantha Brown vs Kathryn Lloyd / Veronica Vannoy6-0, 6-0
2025-03-03vs Norbeck Kickin' AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichaella Belford / Samantha Brown vs Melissa Persak / Shivaun Wilkinson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Kline / Maura Gordy vs Marissa McTernan / Meliha Halpern6-3, 6-3
2025-02-28vs The PlayersLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Ruyak / Maura Gordy vs Elizabeth Wenzel / Ursula Iannone3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichaella Belford / Amrita Rai vs Tracy Koretsky / Sheila Maloney2-6, 2-6
2025-02-20vs Have A Slice DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesSkye Replogle / Carolyn Ruyak vs Tamara Kucik / Beth Sodie6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarina Bartozzi / Samantha Brown vs Tonya Esposito / Katey Nalls6-1, 6-2
2025-02-10vs Wager-Congressional 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Skye Replogle vs Courtney Jaeger / Kristin Stipicevic6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRenata Raeder / Michaella Belford vs Alison Wager / Jaci Peterson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Kline / Anne-Marie Coakley vs Stephanie van Pelt / Jennifer Love2-6, 0-6
2025-02-03vs Manor 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Brown / Skye Replogle vs Grace Coleman / Marie Kushlis5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaura Gordy / Natalie Green vs Laura Davis / Abbie Brady4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmrita Rai / Tracy Aschenbach vs Veronica Vannoy / KAREN WALKER1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-14vs The PlayersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichaella Belford / Natalie Green vs Cynthia Mariz / Kamlesh Dhallan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmrita Rai / Renata Raeder vs Wendy Wasserman / Rise Lancoon5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Skye Replogle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Carina Bartozzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Alexandra Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jennie Canan
published
2.84
Carolyn Ruyak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Anne Kline
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Tracy Aschenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Maura Gordy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Renata Raeder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Anne-Marie Coakley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
kathleen kennedy
published
Amrita Rai
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Michaella Belford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skye Replogle
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Carina Bartozzi
11W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Alexandra Doyle
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jennie Canan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Carolyn Ruyak
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Anne Kline
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Aschenbach
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Maura Gordy
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Renata Raeder
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Anne-Marie Coakley
5W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
kathleen kennedy
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amrita Rai
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michaella Belford
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.