Teams

Tharp/LR/Reb

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-03vs McColey/LR/LRACLost 01
L#2 DoublesValerie Hunt / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Courtney Jones / Eden Raines2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-26vs Hartsfield/Light/NLR/BPLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Shiloah Kviatkovsky vs Sara Gardner / Victoria Dejoy6-7, 5-7
2026-03-12vs Jeter/LR/CCLRLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Jennifer Bailey vs Marcie Jeter / Shemeko Corbin3-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs Hartsfield/Light/NLR/BPWon 10
W#4 DoublesShiloah Kviatkovsky / Rebecca Kinworthy vs Cindy Golden / Lori Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Dana Rodriguez
published 4.5
3.85
Cheryl Schluterman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Courtney Cisne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Valerie Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.73
Tiffani Jedlicka
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.70
Pam Landis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Jennifer Fielding
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Suzy Bender
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Mitsy Tharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jennifer Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Landis + Mitsy Tharp5061% games+4.9% vs expected
Pam Landis + Courtney Cisne14755% games+0.5% vs expected
Rebecca Kinworthy + Shiloah Kviatkovsky213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Rodriguez
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Cheryl Schluterman
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Courtney Cisne
48W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Valerie Hunt
25W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Tiffani Jedlicka
82W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Pam Landis
45W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
163W–105L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Jennifer Fielding
27W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Suzy Bender
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
Mitsy Tharp
27W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
Shiloah Kviatkovsky
67W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Jennifer Bailey
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.