Teams

Encantada Las Prevalecientes

Adult 55 & Over 2025 · Adult 55 & Over W6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-28vs San Francisco EmmaLost 02
L#3 DoublesMarina Torres / Janette Garcia vs Emma M Cestero / Carmen Cintron Mercado0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesVanessa Anton / Kate Breen vs Maria Elena Diaz Beselin / Wanda Archilla3-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs CTH Yadira CardonaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Chavez / Janette Garcia vs Yadira Cardona / Lissette Alvarez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesVanessa Anton / Kate Breen vs Zaida Perez / Rosa Jordan1-6, 3-6
2025-06-19vs San Francisco EmmaWon 20
W#3 DoublesMarina Torres / Janette Garcia vs Maria Negron / Nora Capriles6-2, 6-4
W#4 DoublesElizabeth Chavez / Ary Sanchez vs Diana Velazquez / Karen Colon Nieves6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Veredas- WandaLost 02
L#2 DoublesMarina Torres / Janette Garcia vs Myriam Colom Martinez / CARMEN ARROYO4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSorimar Olmo / Ary Sanchez vs Diana Rodriguez / Maria de Negron Iglesias2-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs Veredas- WandaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDolores Rodriguez / Sorimar Olmo vs Diana Rodriguez / Maria de Negron Iglesias0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanette Garcia / Vanessa Anton vs Evelyn Bermudez / Karen Rivera2-6, 1-6
2025-06-07vs Caribbean/Torres/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDolores Rodriguez / Sorimar Olmo vs Deshia Maldonado / Ana Garcia1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesJanette Garcia / Vanessa Anton vs Damarys Diaz / Maribel de Jesus2-6, 0-6
2025-05-15vs CTH Yadira CardonaLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Chavez / Janette Garcia vs Zaida Perez / Rosa Jordan0-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs Caribbean/Torres/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Chavez / Janette Garcia vs Ana Garcia / Deshia Maldonado6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAry Sanchez / Marina Torres vs Ruth Rodriguez / Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Adult 55 & Over W6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Caribbean/Torres/55&Over6.0W71211127247
2CTH Yadira Cardona53141840301
3Encantada Las Prevalecientes35181435293
4Veredas- Wanda35161636299
5San Francisco Emma26112145312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
ALICIA SAGASTI
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Carol Badillo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.77
Margaret Matos
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
Ary Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Vanessa Anton
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Kate Breen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Janette Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Elizabeth Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Sylvette Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Dolores Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Marina Torres
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sorimar Olmo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Matos + Carol Badillo8259% games+8.1% vs expected
ALICIA SAGASTI + Sylvette Rivera7356% games+4.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Chavez + Carol Badillo6656% games+3.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Chavez + Janette Garcia3248% games−1.1% vs expected
Marina Torres + Carol Badillo1536% games−2.3% vs expected
Marina Torres + Janette Garcia3638% games−2.6% vs expected
Kate Breen + Vanessa Anton044 matchesnot enough data
Marina Torres + Sylvette Rivera123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
ALICIA SAGASTI
91W–59L career · type A · 12 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Carol Badillo
124W–99L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Margaret Matos
65W–67L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ary Sanchez
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Anton
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
Kate Breen
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Janette Garcia
9W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Elizabeth Chavez
13W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
Sylvette Rivera
41W–57L career · 12 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Dolores Rodriguez
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Marina Torres
15W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sorimar Olmo
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.