Teams

SIMS:Condit

2022 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 18 & Over Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.39 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-15vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Werner / Courtney Marum vs Donald Hoover / Lauren Riether-Mills1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ness / Kristina Keegan vs Kyle Riether / KORI BURKHOLDER6-3, 6-2
2022-05-06vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Bowers / Christie Albera vs Carlos Salmon / Audra Gillard6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ness / Courtney Marum vs Donald Hoover / Charlotte Smith4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Werner / Valerie Sorensen vs Mary Byrne / Rostyk Datsko4-6, 4-6
2022-04-01vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Bowers / Christie Albera vs Carlos Salmon / KORI BURKHOLDER6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAdam Weinstein / Courtney Marum vs Juan Pablo Gutierrez / Lauren Riether-Mills6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Werner / Julie McNeill vs Donald Hoover / Charlotte Smith3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-13vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristie Albera / Jeffrey Bowers vs Carlos Salmon / Varsha Rathore3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErica Maglieri / David Werner vs Lauren Riether-Mills / Juan Pablo Gutierrez6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Marum / Adam Weinstein vs Kyle Riether / Mary Byrne6-1, 6-1
2022-02-18vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Condit / Adam Weinstein vs Rostyk Datsko / Pamela Jeppson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bowers / Christie Albera vs Juan Pablo Gutierrez / Audra Gillard6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Kessler / Courtney Marum vs Donald Hoover / Charlotte Smith1-6, 3-6
2022-01-23vs BTC:What She Said:Smalley/DatskoLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Bowers / Christie Albera vs Carlos Salmon / Varsha Rathore4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Weinstein / Kristina Keegan vs Pamela Jeppson / Juan Pablo Gutierrez0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErica Maglieri / Matthew Ness vs Donald Hoover / Charlotte Smith2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 18 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:What She Said:Smalley/Datsko4211716139
2SIMS:Condit2471124172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Erica Bridge
published 4.5
4.43
Adam Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Julie Condit
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Christie Albera
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
David Werner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Courtney Marum
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.21
Jeffrey Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.19
Emily Bazelon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Erica Maglieri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Daniel Kessler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Kristina Keegan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Matthew Ness
published 4
3.66
Valerie Sorensen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Julie McNeill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Albera + Adam Weinstein4159% games−7.7% vs expected
Erica Maglieri + Adam Weinstein5159% games−9.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Bowers + Christie Albera3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erica Bridge
64W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Adam Weinstein
88W–36L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
4.43
Julie Condit
110W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Christie Albera
101W–61L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
David Werner
17W–28L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Courtney Marum
116W–34L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Jeffrey Bowers
30W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Emily Bazelon
52W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Erica Maglieri
46W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4
Daniel Kessler
87W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Kristina Keegan
58W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Matthew Ness
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Valerie Sorensen
134W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Julie McNeill
44W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.