Teams

We Got This!

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 6.0 - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-20vs KohnWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimber Nelson / Robbie Spicer vs Lisa Holt / Michele Surmelis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Wood / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Colleen Hansen / Kathy Gwinn7-6, 7-6
2024-04-13vs KohnSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Hall / Heidi Wood vs Lisa Holt / Michele Surmelis1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobbie Spicer / Kimber Nelson vs Kathy Kuhn / Lori Head6-1, 6-0
2024-04-04vs KohnSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Dickerson / Kaydene Gilbert vs Lori Head / Michele Surmelis7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Hall / Venita Petti vs Nilsa Kohn / Colleen Hansen6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-29vs KohnWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimber Nelson / Karen Dickerson vs Colleen Hansen / Michele Surmelis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-09vs KohnWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimber Nelson / Kaydene Gilbert vs Donna Araki / Lori Head4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Wood / Julie Hall vs Nilsa Kohn / Kathy Kuhn6-2, 6-1
2024-03-05vs KohnLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimber Nelson / Kaydene Gilbert vs Lisa Holt / Michele Surmelis3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Julie Hall vs Shauna Myler / Lori Head2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Robbie Spicer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Karen Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.69
Venita Petti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Kimber Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.52
Kaydene Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Julie Hall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Venita Petti + Carrie Rose Lindley8650% games−1.0% vs expected
Kaydene Gilbert + Kimber Nelson51642% games−10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robbie Spicer
33W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
73W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Karen Dickerson
66W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Venita Petti
82W–116L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kimber Nelson
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Kaydene Gilbert
14W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Julie Hall
25W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.