Teams

Pro-deucers

2025 18&Over Women · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-06vs Serve-ivorsLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Madan / Robyn Wishna vs Madi Maley / Vivian Zayas1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKyoungsoo Lee vs Natasha Mariano1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelsey Pierce / Bettina Podkaminer vs Halli Sparks / Kathleen Jordan3-6, 5-7
2025-06-30vs Serve-ivorsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Cannon / Aija Leiponen vs Vivian Zayas / Ashley Paolangeli4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLarisa Vygran / Jennifer Kagan vs Irina Naydich / Natasha Mariano2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKyoungsoo Lee vs Jenna Holmes6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Kohut / Bettina Podkaminer vs Patricia McClary / Sally True4-6, 6-7
2025-06-23vs Serve-ivorsLost 14
W#1 DoublesMichelle Cannon / Dewi Rainey vs Beth Ahner / Patricia McClary6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLarisa Vygran vs Madi Maley3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAija Leiponen / Jennifer Kagan vs Kathleen Jordan / Halli Sparks3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKyoungsoo Lee vs Meredith Holgerson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDoorim Kim / Bettina Podkaminer vs Irina Naydich / Laura Falk1-6, 5-7
2025-06-14vs Serve-ivorsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLarisa Vygran / Michelle Cannon vs Madi Maley / Meredith Holgerson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobyn Wishna / Kyoungsoo Lee vs Irina Zhankov / Beth Ahner6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDewi Rainey vs Jenna Holmes6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBettina Podkaminer / Kelsey Pierce vs Irina Naydich / Laura Falk1-6, 0-6
2025-06-09vs Serve-ivorsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAija Leiponen / Emily Madan vs Irina Naydich / Heather Harrick6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Kohut vs Madi Maley3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cannon / Jennifer Kagan vs Patricia McClary / Meredith Holgerson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-24vs Serve-ivorsLost 23
L#1 DoublesEmily Madan / Larisa Vygran vs Ashley Paolangeli / Madi Maley2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJenny Barnett vs Vivian Zayas1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKyoungsoo Lee / You Soon Baek vs Irina Zhankov / Kathleen Jordan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDewi Rainey vs Jenna Holmes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAija Leiponen / Doorim Kim vs Laura Falk / Sally True2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Serve-ivorsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLarisa Vygran / Jenny Barnett vs Ashley Paolangeli / Heather Harrick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAija Leiponen / Jennifer Kagan vs Irina Naydich / Patricia McClary7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDewi Rainey vs Jenna Holmes6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKyoungsoo Lee / Doorim Kim vs Laura Falk / Sally True6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve-ivors52191636299
2Pro-deucers25152045340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Emily Madan
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Aija Leiponen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Dewi Rainey
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Amy Kohut
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Kyoungsoo Lee
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Bettina Podkaminer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Kelsey Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jennifer Kagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Barnett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Larisa Vygran
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Robyn Wishna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
You Soon Baek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aija Leiponen + Emily Madan314 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Cannon + Aija Leiponen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Madan
132W–60L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Aija Leiponen
73W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Dewi Rainey
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Kohut
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kyoungsoo Lee
24W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
3
Bettina Podkaminer
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Pierce
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Jennifer Kagan
31W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Barnett
66W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Larisa Vygran
35W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Cannon
47W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Wishna
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
You Soon Baek
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.