Teams

Mat.Alford40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-15vs Ro.Harris40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJosh Hastings / William Slocum vs PEDRO J LEON / Patrick Dougherty6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Albertson / Drew Hartsfield vs Robert Harris / Gary la Manna6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-08vs Ke.Lesher40A3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesWilliam Slocum vs Brian Lape6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Webb / Thomas Albertson vs Peter Charland / Roger Parro6-1, 6-4
2024-05-01vs Jo.Hoomani40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesWilliam Slocum / Thomas Albertson vs Matt Bergevin / John Blais6-2, 6-1
2024-04-24vs Ch.Clift40AWon 20
W#2 DoublesMatthew Alford / Thomas Albertson vs Nick Leverett / Ben Williams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Webb / William Slocum vs Brian Ross / Bryan Sutton6-4, 6-1
2024-04-17vs Da.Rea40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Albertson / Kyle Truman vs Ed Stempien / AP Blake4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-10vs Ro.Harris40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Albertson / Mickey Kendziora vs Scott Thurston / Patrick Dougherty4-6, 3-6
2024-04-03vs Ke.Lesher40A3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Albertson / William Slocum vs Peter Charland / Roger Parro3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-21vs Jo.Hoomani40AWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Webb / William Slocum vs John Blais / Ed Spina7-5, 6-4
2024-03-13vs Ch.Clift40ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesThomas Albertson / Cam Copley vs Les Murray / Don Hunt4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMickey Kendziora / William Slocum vs Bryan Sutton / Jason Scimeca6-3, 6-2
2024-03-11vs Da.Rea40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Albertson / Drew Hartsfield vs Jeremy Broglin / Brian McLean6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
William Slocum
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Josh Hastings
published
2.99
Patrick Webb
published
2.97
Thomas Albertson
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.79
Cam Copley
published 3
2.73
Kyle Truman
published
Travis Salts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Slocum + Thomas Albertson3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
William Slocum
54W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Josh Hastings
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
Patrick Webb
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Thomas Albertson
49W–37L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Cam Copley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Kyle Truman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Travis Salts
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.