Teams

Tampa Yacht Party at the Net - M. James

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesKelley Sadlowski / Molly James vs Liza Geist / Elizabeth Hanlon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Boe / Jennifer Berk vs Melissa Speidel / Ruby Sanders6-1, 6-1
2025-05-21vs PC Overserved - C. EicholtzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly James / Kelley Sadlowski vs Cindy Eicholtz / Caro Massari6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBelem Schmidt / Kristen Richards vs Susanna Bray / Jessica Shea3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSarah Lindbeck / Molly James vs Stacy Leatherman / Michele Curtin6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKristen Richards vs Lisa Lalis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Boe / Belem Schmidt vs Cindy Crum / Francesca LoMonaco6-3, 6-1
2025-05-09vs Avila Aces - I. PetersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelley Sadlowski / Sarah Lindbeck vs Rachel Badyna / Lina Dey0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMolly James vs Vanessa Bergin7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Richards / Belem Schmidt vs Ivy Peterson / Sally Sierra0-6, 3-6
2025-04-25vs VDF String Queens - S. CornellWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Lindbeck / Jennifer Berk vs Vanvisa Cheung / Linda Frank6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Boe / Belem Schmidt vs Robin Feocco / Mary Kampsen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Sarah Boe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Belem Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Kristen Richards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.10
Sarah Lindbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Molly James
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.99
Kelley Sadlowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Berk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Sadlowski + Molly James123 matchesnot enough data
Belem Schmidt + Kristen Richards033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Boe
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Belem Schmidt
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Kristen Richards
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Sarah Lindbeck
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Molly James
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Kelley Sadlowski
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Jennifer Berk
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.