Teams

Frame/Murfreesboro

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Murfreesboro · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.86 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs Blankenship/MurfreesboroWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Horna / Beth Frame vs Cassie Bourdon / Mary Elam Polk2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Houck / Alicia Zimmer vs Tonia Porter / Angela Blankenship2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Janet Adamson vs Kelly Lee / Tammy Shrivalle6-0, 6-1
W#4 DoublesShannon Smith / Kaly Bush vs Suzanne Eubank / Melanie Shipp6-1, 6-1
2025-05-04vs FEYES/MurfreesboroLost 23
W#1 DoublesShannon Smith / Kaly Bush vs Heather Laney / Tammy Jirjis6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Houck vs Jeanai Kluge2-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Frame / Jennifer Kelley vs Stacey Andrews / Shelly Laub5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Chaffin / Collier Andress Smith vs Katherine Goodson / Scotty Falk2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesKelly Horna / Joy Owens vs Cindy Mccullough / Kathleen Carbonari2-6, 6-7
2025-04-13vs Blankenship/MurfreesboroWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Horna / Kelly Mason vs Tammy Shrivalle / Sally Wrather6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaly Bush vs Sara Bryson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRonda Hawkins / Jennifer Kelley vs Cassie Bourdon / Mary Elam Polk6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCollier Andress Smith / Pamela Hicks vs Kelly Lee / Tracy LaRoy6-3, 7-6
L#4 DoublesCaroline Houck / Jeanine Dyer vs Suzanne Eubank / Shannon Fox5-7, 6-7
2025-04-06vs FEYES/MurfreesboroLost 14
L#1 DoublesCollier Andress Smith / Janet Adamson vs Stacey Andrews / Shelly Laub6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Zimmer vs Sharling Grummon4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kelley / Beth Frame vs Tydres Mestiri / Katie Feyes6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Julie Wishing vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Cindy Mccullough1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesChrissy Manley / Brenda Monajjem vs Katherine Goodson / Stephanie Feyes4-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs Blankenship/MurfreesboroWon 41
W#1 DoublesCindy Chaffin / Chrissy Manley vs Shannon Johnson Waxman / Mary White6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlicia Zimmer vs Tonia Porter6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Wishing / Joy Owens vs Shannon Fox / Cassie Bourdon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Jeanine Dyer vs Sara Bryson / Niki Delk2-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesRonda Hawkins / Brenda Monajjem vs Clair Cochran / Angela Blankenship7-6, 6-2
2025-04-04vs FEYES/MurfreesboroLost 14
W#1 DoublesKelly Horna / Joy Owens vs Katherine Goodson / Stephanie Feyes2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlicia Zimmer vs Jeanai Kluge3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChrissy Manley / Beth Frame vs Kathleen Carbonari / Katie Feyes1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Kathleen Doulin / Sarah Green4-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesJulie Wishing / Cindy Chaffin vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Michelle Hamman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Collier Andress Smith
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Kaly Bush
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Jeanine Dyer
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kelly Horna
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Chrissy Manley
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Brenda Monajjem
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Alicia Zimmer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Joy Owens
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Caroline Houck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Beth Frame
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Cindy Chaffin
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Ronda Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Pamela Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Wishing
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Monajjem + Ronda Hawkins4252% games+6.0% vs expected
Beth Frame + Cindy Chaffin3450% games+1.5% vs expected
Brenda Monajjem + Joy Owens1444% games−9.4% vs expected
Jan Phanthalangsy + Brenda Monajjem044 matchesnot enough data
Jan Phanthalangsy + Cindy Chaffin123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Brenda Monajjem123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Joy Owens213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Collier Andress Smith
31W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Kaly Bush
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jeanine Dyer
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kelly Horna
19W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Chrissy Manley
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Brenda Monajjem
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Alicia Zimmer
12W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Joy Owens
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Caroline Houck
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Beth Frame
21W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Chaffin
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Ronda Hawkins
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Pamela Hicks
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Julie Wishing
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.