Teams

WW-Wayland

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs MAC-HuangWon 10
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Ryan Harris vs Allen Huang / Donna Talamo6-4, 6-3
2023-03-11vs ACAC-DelisioLost 01
L#2 DoublesJon Kilberg / Katie Gerecke vs Liesl Delisio / Bert Teachey5-7, 7-6
2023-03-11vs RAIN-EarleWon 10
W#2 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Ryan Harris vs Douglas Erickson / Donna Moody6-2, 7-5
2023-02-19vs MTC-ScammellLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Chris Gerecke vs Lindsey Scammell / Douglas Scammell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-01-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJon Kilberg / Bobbie Lou Oley vs Elana Bowman / Jeffrey Blasko6-3, 6-3
2023-01-07vs SAL-MoorheadSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Chris Gerecke vs Lauren Cecil / Kent Boerner4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBobbie Lou Oley / Matthew Boys vs Emily Hartman / John Liscio6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Charles Wayland
published 4.5
3.96
Matthew Boys
published
3.89
Abigail Dryden
published 4
3.77
Brigitte Fanelli
published 4
3.75
Chris Gerecke
published 4
3.75
William Pilc
published
3.73
Barbara Hassett
published 4
3.69
Michael Fanelli
published
3.69
Bobbie Lou Oley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.63
Jon Kilberg
published
3.61
Katie Gerecke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Chris Gilman
published 3.5
3.33
3.20
Patricia Bishop
published
3.12
Robert Nilson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Wayland
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Matthew Boys
24W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Abigail Dryden
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Brigitte Fanelli
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Chris Gerecke
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
William Pilc
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Hassett
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Michael Fanelli
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Bobbie Lou Oley
139W–64L career · 9 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Jon Kilberg
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Katie Gerecke
109W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Gilman
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.35
Jacquelyn Kennedy-Russo
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.33
Patricia Bishop
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Robert Nilson
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.