Teams

SVB - D. Lynham

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-17vs Hills/Williams/40&Over4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Williams / Todd Owen vs Felipe Martinez / Paul Zack2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohnny Fung / Joey Campbell vs Sylvain Gauthier / Jose Alomar3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDENIS LYNHAM / Shashikiran Suresh vs Jakob Andersen / Eugen Schwarz1-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesEddie Collins / Siwei Jin vs Sundar Ekambaram / Adam Bell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Saddlebrook - L. BarbettaLost 01
L#4 DoublesJohnny Fung / Gregory Morrissey vs Albert Alhadeff / David King4-6, 0-6
2025-04-19vs Cheval Knights - M. HayesWon 10
W#4 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Johnny Fung vs Matthew Hayes / Peter Martino3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Hills/Williams/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregory Morrissey / Johnny Fung vs Paul Zack / Felipe Martinez2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joey Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Erik Hajek
published 4
3.71
Chad Paluzzi
published 4
3.71
Siwei Jin
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Ronald March
published
3.68
Eddie Collins
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Shashikiran Suresh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
DENIS LYNHAM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Johnny Fung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Gregory Morrissey
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Ken Chin
published
Todd Owen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald March + Joey Campbell3746% games−1.8% vs expected
Erik Hajek + Eddie Collins2351% games−2.1% vs expected
Joey Campbell + Johnny Fung1442% games−7.1% vs expected
Shashikiran Suresh + Chad Paluzzi1440% gamesnot enough data
Siwei Jin + Eddie Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Campbell
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Erik Hajek
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Chad Paluzzi
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Siwei Jin
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Ronald March
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Shashikiran Suresh
30W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
DENIS LYNHAM
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Johnny Fung
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
4
Gregory Morrissey
131W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Todd Owen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.