Teams

OATES/RVILLE/BP

2026 Combo 55 & Over 7.5 · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Burns Park Tennis Center
Sep 17 7:30 PM
Burns Park Tennis Center
Sep 21 7:30 PM
Burns Park Tennis Center
Sep 29 7:30 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
2026-09-01vs Robinson/Lynch/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesMilli Stanley / Deanna Garretson vs Donna Alford / Amie Hill7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Childers / Allison Baker vs Laura Titus / Leslie Lants3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Long / Melissa Oates vs Lindsey Ryan / Elaine Bultena5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stewart/LR/OC000000
2Robinson/Lynch/LR/Reb000000
3Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP000000
4Dickson/LR/LRAC000000
5Scheffler/LR/BP000000
6OATES/RVILLE/BP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Wendy Hannah
published
3.49
Michele Stearns
published
3.48
Jill Childers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Katie Staggs
published
3.40
Tracy Holland
published
3.38
Deanna Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Robbie Rutherford
published
3.23
Melissa Oates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Milli Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Donna Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Garretson + Melissa Oates2643% games−0.2% vs expected
Wendy Hannah + Melissa Oates5059% gamesnot enough data
Katie Staggs + Milli Stanley314 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Garretson + Michele Stearns123 matchesnot enough data
Milli Stanley + Robbie Rutherford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Hannah
22W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Michele Stearns
10W–29L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jill Childers
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Katie Staggs
22W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Tracy Holland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Robbie Rutherford
21W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Melissa Oates
26W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Milli Stanley
26W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Donna Long
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.