Teams

LA - Dare Doubles

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23vs LA - Fuzz OffWon 31
L#1 DoublesHilary Angelo / Gina Petersen vs Chiara Slewett / Nas Cohen1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMayLin Tao vs Michelle Sarraf6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Sanchez / Liz Rosman vs Gillian Wiener / Laura Winslow6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Nyad / Portia Furst vs Wendy Gross / Sarah Baldwin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-25vs LA-LLW-Lady Aces-Kim DavisLost 13
W#1 DoublesStefanie Hall / Eleanor DeMartino vs Rashidah Shakir / Megan Colombaroni7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPortia Furst vs Tonya Crowe0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Mochkatel / Patricia Lombard vs Cass Casseus / Sheronda Smith3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Rosman / Gina Petersen vs Tanya Hunt / LOLA HERRON1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Elena Howell
published
2.93
Gloria Chang
published
2.90
Eleanor DeMartino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
MayLin Tao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Alexandra Miller
published 3
Diana Nyad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Robin Rosen
published
2.73
Stefanie Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Michele Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Diane Wagner
published 3
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
published
2.62
Renee Mochkatel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Sarah Noonan
published
2.50
Gina Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Liz Rosman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Portia Furst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.29
Hilary Angelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Keleigh Morgan
published
Patricia Lombard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Rosman + Gina Petersen6254% games+4.0% vs expected
Eleanor DeMartino + Elena Howell2439% games−10.7% vs expected
Raquelle de la Rocha + Portia Furst123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elena Howell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Gloria Chang
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Eleanor DeMartino
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
MayLin Tao
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alexandra Miller
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diana Nyad
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Rosen
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Stefanie Hall
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Michele Sanchez
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Diane Wagner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Renee Mochkatel
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Sarah Noonan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Gina Petersen
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Portia Furst
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Hilary Angelo
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
Keleigh Morgan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Lombard
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.