Teams

Kim/RockBarn/Foothills

2024 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-21vs Henderson/DV/FoothillsWon 20
W#2 DoublesLydia Sanders / Paula Oliver vs Sarah Long / Emily Moore7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Becky Brittain vs Jessie Dale / Meghan Wills6-2, 6-2
2024-05-07vs Kraus/CRCC/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Lydia Sanders vs Susie Kraus / Susan Davis3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Collins / Pam Britt vs Michelle Huffman / Karen Isbell6-4, 6-4
2024-04-30vs Barefoot/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Britt / Mitzi Arrowood vs Ashley Stahlschmidt / Angie Aycock6-1, 7-5
2024-04-23vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Kathy Collins vs Olivia Good / Rachel Good4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPam Britt / Paula Oliver vs Shannon Fuller / Maria Sherrill6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-09vs Geyer-Shafer/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPaula Oliver vs Staci Shafer2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPam Britt / Sara Griffith vs Hilary May / Paris Sellers6-4, 6-1
2024-04-08vs vonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Lydia Sanders vs Kelly Meier / Sondra Simmons7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Oliver / Sara Griffith vs Rhonda Kiser / Lisa Moore3-6, 5-7
2024-03-19vs Henderson/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Britt / Mitzi Arrowood vs Brooke Ransdell / Stacey Rex7-5, 6-3
2024-03-12vs Kraus/CRCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBecky Brittain / Kathy Collins vs Michelle Huffman / Joy Romano6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMitzi Arrowood / Pam Britt vs Susan Davis / Karen Isbell6-4, 6-4
2024-03-05vs Barefoot/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesBecky Brittain vs Holly Barefoot1-6, 2-6
2024-02-27vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Britt / Kathy Collins vs Karen Shokes / Rachel Good1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Brittain / Lydia Sanders vs Shannon Fuller / Maria Sherrill1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Maile Kim
published
3.13
Becky Brittain
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Emily Spillman
published
2.98
Kathy Collins
published
2.95
Nina Scopes
published
2.79
Pam Britt
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
Ann Gerson
published 3
2.73
Amy Lawton
published 3
2.62
Mitzi Arrowood
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.59
Allison Alexander
published 2.5
2.51
Paula Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Brittain + Emily Spillman5262% games+5.5% vs expected
Pam Britt + Mitzi Arrowood12955% games+0.6% vs expected
Maile Kim + Becky Brittain6254% games−0.8% vs expected
Mitzi Arrowood + Becky Brittain6550% gamesnot enough data
Pam Britt + Becky Brittain5055% gamesnot enough data
Mitzi Arrowood + Paula Oliver0527% gamesnot enough data
Mitzi Arrowood + Emily Spillman224 matchesnot enough data
Paula Oliver + Becky Brittain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maile Kim
24W–36L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Becky Brittain
137W–96L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Emily Spillman
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.07
Kathy Collins
31W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Nina Scopes
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Pam Britt
111W–102L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ann Gerson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Amy Lawton
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Mitzi Arrowood
123W–165L career · 17 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
2.5
Allison Alexander
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Paula Oliver
50W–105L career · 13 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.