Teams

HCC - L. Oonk

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesKaren MacCormack / Kimberly French vs Asbel Giang / Melissa Minniti6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanel Hutchinson / Christina Dorothy vs Nicole Allen / Derry Agnini6-0
2024-03-02vs HCC AldeenLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Lynne Beal vs Farheen Aldeen / Bec Bruning1-6, 1-6
2024-02-24vs Hills/Means/18&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren MacCormack / Jessica DeLaRosa-Zimring vs Lilivette Arroyo / Eva Sambrano5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Oonk / Lynne Beal vs Maki Smith / Meredith Mueller1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKimberly French / Karen MacCormack vs Asbel Giang / Jennifer Myers6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Oonk / Jamie Heagy vs Debra Stump / Derry Agnini2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-02-03vs HCC AldeenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Heagy / Lisa Oonk vs Bec Bruning / Elaine Aschenbrenner2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Evangelista / Janel Hutchinson vs Cassandra Remedios / Elizabeth Gerlach3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-20vs Hills/Means/18&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica DeLaRosa-Zimring / Karen MacCormack vs Maki Smith / Mollie Simpson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Heagy / Christina Dorothy vs Kayla Dyer / Stephanie Wager2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & OverDay - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Karen MacCormack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Andria Owen
published 4.5
4.20
Christina Dorothy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Jenelle Gallaway
published 4.5
4.05
4.00
Lynne Beal
published
3.92
Rebecca Evangelista
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
Kimberly French
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Dorothy + Karen MacCormack4155% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Oonk + Jenelle Gallaway033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen MacCormack
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Andria Owen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Christina Dorothy
134W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Jenelle Gallaway
39W–24L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.05
Lynne Beal
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Rebecca Evangelista
113W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–232L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
Kimberly French
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.