Teams

NRS/Zoetmulder

2026 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over WINTER · 4.0 Men-Wed Night

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-04vs VBTC/SpaethSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBryan Richardson / Christopher Cafarelli vs Edgar Botero / Mark Hanlon1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTom Hazlett / Olivier Bertrand vs Norman Knowles / Nathan Burkett-Cadena6-4, 6-2
2026-02-25vs VBTC/SpaethWon 21
L#1 DoublesSander Brooks / Scott Mayer vs Edgar Botero / Mark Hanlon1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEric Zoetmulder vs Nathan Burkett-Cadena7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBlair Wickstrom / Olivier Bertrand vs Kirby Tucker / Norman Knowles6-1, 6-3
2026-02-18vs VBTC/SpaethWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Zoetmulder / Bryan Richardson vs Edgar Botero / Mark Hanlon7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Mayer / Sander Brooks vs Nathan Burkett-Cadena / Norman Knowles6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBlair Wickstrom / Christopher Cafarelli vs Kirby Tucker / Donald Spaeth1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-11vs VBTC/SpaethSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Zoetmulder / Tom Hazlett vs Randy Walker / Kirby Tucker6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBlair Wickstrom / Olivier Bertrand vs Donald Spaeth / Nathan Burkett-Cadena1-6, 3-6
2026-01-28vs VBTC/SpaethWon 20
W#1 SinglesBryan Richardson vs Randy Walker7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSander Brooks / Olivier Bertrand vs Robert Kenney / Daniel Culumber6-3, 6-4
2026-01-21vs VBTC/SpaethWon 30
W#1 DoublesBryan Richardson / Alan Hughes vs Edgar Botero / Mark Hanlon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBlair Wickstrom / Tom Hazlett vs Donald Spaeth / Nathan Burkett-Cadena6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEric Zoetmulder / Olivier Bertrand vs Norman Knowles / Robert Kenney6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men-Wed Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Eric Zoetmulder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Tom Hazlett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Bryan Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.83
Sander Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Blair Wickstrom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Olivier Bertrand
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Christopher Cafarelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Zoetmulder
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.93
Tom Hazlett
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Bryan Richardson
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Sander Brooks
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Blair Wickstrom
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Olivier Bertrand
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Christopher Cafarelli
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.