Teams

Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 4.5 Men Monday

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-03vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Tommy Houston6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Ako Barnes6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCharlie Keeley vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-27vs Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Pa Thawng6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Polo Carrera4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCharlie Keeley vs Edwin Maffiold7-5, 6-3
2026-07-16vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Tommy Houston6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJames Kash vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash5-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Wilson Paine7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Edwin Maffiold5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Brian Cohen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJames Kash vs Lee Picklesimer4-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Tommy Houston3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCharlie Keeley vs Aaron Charles Pascua6-3, 6-1
2026-06-15vs Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesJosue Sanchez vs Lee Picklesimer1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJames Kash vs Pa Thawng6-7, 2-6
2026-06-01vs Houston 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesTK Vacharee vs Aadarsh Sivaprakash6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTaylor Schiess vs Tommy Houston3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesCharlie Keeley vs Ako Barnes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesCharlie Keeley vs Brian Cohen3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJames Kash vs Matt Hughes4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Pa Thawng3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Taylor Schiess
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.21
TK Vacharee
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.14
Josue Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.10
Charlie Keeley
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.07
James Kash
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.69
Charles Calkins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Schiess
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
TK Vacharee
13W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Josue Sanchez
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Charlie Keeley
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
James Kash
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Charles Calkins
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.