Teams

Pacemakers

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-18vs Kick Aces 40Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle Barratt / Lisa Kunioka vs Kathleen Dinman / Teri Lathrop3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTomoko Hardman / Kathryn Kirley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-12vs KLTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Chapman / Shirley Marks vs Lori Loo / Laura Shimada1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAngie Crawford vs Kanae Abe6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaria Frostic / Hillary Quam vs Trisha Inafuku / Renee Ishida0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Brady / Lisa Kunioka vs Rie Kodama / Karen Yamaguchi3-6, 1-6
2023-03-11Split 11
W#2 DoublesTomoko Hardman / Kathryn Kirley vs Karen Howes / Aileen Onodera-Yuh7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Barratt / Lisa Kunioka vs Jennifer Harada / Xi Yi Lai2-6, 5-7
2023-02-25Lost 03
L#2 DoublesTomoko Hardman / Hillary Quam vs Beverly Ishii-Nakayama / Ruby May Fernandez0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJoan Kuh vs Janet Wang-Lee3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Barratt / Lisa Kunioka vs Janet Fujiyama / Olivia Rezentes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-18vs Happy Hour! Double Shots!Won 20
W#1 DoublesEllen Brady / Joan Kuh vs Francine Crail / Phoebe Nikolakakis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Kunioka / Yoshie Groves vs Jenny Wendel / Jodie Nagasako6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKathryn Kirley / Lisa Kunioka vs Ada Ozaki / Clarie Santos5-7, 2-6
2023-02-08vs Fireball 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesEllen Brady / Joan Kuh vs Chantal Seitz / Dani Asuka7-6, 6-3
2023-01-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarole Petersen / Tomoko Hardman vs Andrea McCarley / Allison Paynter6-2, 6-4
2023-01-14vs Baby Got BackhandWon 41
L#1 DoublesAngie Crawford / Ellen Brady vs Dayna Luka / Alohalani Slover7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHillary Quam vs Shoko Burkett6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTomoko Hardman / Kathryn Kirley vs Cherie Dang / Sounthavy Minders3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Capwell vs Jacqueline Jung6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesYoshie Groves / Maria Frostic vs Lori Fujimori / Evelyn Deguzman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ellen Brady
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Yoshie Groves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Angie Crawford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Lisa Kunioka
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Hillary Quam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Maria Frostic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Tomoko Hardman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Carole Petersen
published 3.5
3.15
Michelle Barratt
published
3.14
Joan Kuh
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amy Capwell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Jessica Hawkins
published
Kathryn Kirley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Marks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Frostic + Ellen Brady7358% games+1.6% vs expected
Shirley Marks + Susan Chapman3640% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Kirley + Tomoko Hardman2348% gamesnot enough data
Joan Kuh + Kathryn Kirley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellen Brady
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Yoshie Groves
35W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Angie Crawford
43W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
3.5
Lisa Kunioka
41W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Hillary Quam
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Maria Frostic
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Tomoko Hardman
35W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carole Petersen
12W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Michelle Barratt
28W–25L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Joan Kuh
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
2.5
Amy Capwell
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Hawkins
11W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Kirley
28W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Shirley Marks
22W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan Chapman
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.