Teams

Vaughn/Payne 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday

2026 Piedmont GRETA Fall Singles · 3.0 Women Fall Singles Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Kathleen Mooney0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRosa Chica vs Tara Rusiewicz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Sandy Cathers4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Payne vs Kim Stewart6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRosa Chica vs Tia Opyd2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Heather Barber4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Ariel Holtzman7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesStephanie Oudinot vs Rosemarie Palazzolo0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Brittney Obrien6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Fall Singles Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Rosa Chica
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.55
Meredith Lantz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.54
Jennifer Payne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Julia Saguier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Stephanie Oudinot
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.40
Meredith Vaughn
published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Shar Seyedin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Saguier + Meredith Vaughn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Rosa Chica
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Meredith Lantz
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Payne
17W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Julia Saguier
32W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Stephanie Oudinot
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Meredith Vaughn
7W–19L career · no lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Shar Seyedin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.