Teams

CRowe (Raintree)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Laur / Suzanne MacVicar vs Amber Tibb / Aimee Reed6-1, 6-1
2023-09-21vs ADuncan (JATC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Ladky / Christina Hall vs CC Shellabarger / Jillian Hayes3-6, 0-6
2023-09-07vs JKarasek (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Julia Kirby vs Caroline Dunham / Natalie Stewart0-6, 0-6
2023-08-31vs RJampani (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne MacVicar / Erica Testerman vs Alia Nassri / Melanie Cox2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Ladky / Madison Brown vs Radhika Jampani / Antoinette Tan0-6, 0-6
2023-08-24vs MWolf (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Kirby / Suzanne MacVicar vs Laurie Madonna / Heather Burch3-6, 5-7
2023-08-17vs TLaBrosse/JRafferty (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Ladky / Melissa Orr vs Brooke Cole / Claire Samuels1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Heather Toye
published
2.61
Elizabeth Laur
published
2.45
Melissa Orr
published
2.32
Emily Ladky
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.23
Christina Hall
published 2.5
2.15
Julia Kirby
published
1.98
Erica Testerman
published
1.90
Crystal Rowe
published 2.5
Megan Klinker
published
Rachel Staton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne MacVicar + Emily Ladky134 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Rowe + Erica Testerman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Suzanne MacVicar
88W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Heather Toye
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.69
Elizabeth Laur
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Melissa Orr
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Emily Ladky
25W–52L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Christina Hall
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Julia Kirby
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.15
Erica Testerman
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Crystal Rowe
3W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Megan Klinker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Staton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.